Search for: "In re Steven H. (2001)" Results 41 - 60 of 71
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
The initial tests of the newly articulated standard for admissibility of opinion testimony in silicone litigation did not go well.[3]  Peer review, which was absent in the re-analyses relied upon in the Bendectin litigation, was superficially present in the studies relied upon in the silicone litigation. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 11:37 pm by Steve Vladeck
  Finally, § 2256(g) deals with second or successive applications for habeas relief, and § 2256(h) governs the release of detainees, including § 2256(h)(1), which bars courts from ordering release into the United States, § 2256(h)(2), which leaves up to the Secretary of Homeland Security to transfer a detainee who has been ordered released. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
Since 1663, the Royal Society has sported the motto:  “Nullius in verba,” on no one’s authority. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
Beck, No. 5:06-CT-3018-H, 2006 WL3914717 (E.D.N.C. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am by Anthony B. Cavender
For contractors who often subject to one or more of federal environmental laws or regulations, below is a brief report on some the significant environmental law and administrative cases decided since late June of 2015 by jurisdiction: District of Columbia Energy Future Coalition, et al. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Joiner had can cause small-cell lung cancer.[13] Perhaps the most egregious lapses in scholarship occur when Ranges, a newly minted scientist, and her co-author, a full professor of law, write: “For example, Bendectin, an antinausea medication prescribed to pregnant women, caused a slew of birth defects (hence its nickname ‘The Second Thalidomide’).49”[14] I had to re-read this sentence many times to make sure I was not hallucinating. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Guest Author
  If you’re having trouble understanding the difference, Josh Chafetz has the best articulation of the “strong” version of the MQD: “If a majority of justices determine that eating an ice cream cone is a major question, then it is not enough that Congress has empowered the agency to ‘eat any dessert it chooses. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm by Tom Goldstein
  In 2001, she received tenure. [read post]