Search for: "Inform Inc. v. Google LLC et al" Results 41 - 60 of 113
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case  Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 5:36 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
From the beginning of the case:On December 2, 2013, Apple Inc., Google, Inc. andMotorola Mobility LLC (collectively “Appellees”)) filed apetition for inter partes review (“IPR”) of U.S. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 7:08 pm by Barry Sookman
Jul. 21, 2015) Jim Schumacher, LLC v Spireon, Inc. 2015 WL 3949349 (E.D.Tenn.2015) Darnaa, LLC v Google, Inc 2015 WL 7753406 (N.D.Cal. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 4:49 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The outcome was adverse to Google, and the other defendants [ YOUTUBE, LLC, ESPN, INC. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 9:19 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Luckey went on to form Oculus, LLC, and develop Rift, which became a blockbuster on Kickstarter and was ultimately sold to Facebook for 8 figures. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
District Judge Colleen McMahon rejected Sirius’ arguments that Flo & Eddie Inc, controlled by founding band members Howard Kaylan and Mark Volman, did not own copyrights in The Turtles’ recordings or that Sirius had an “implied” license to play Turtles' songs. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
| Pro-Football Inc v Amanda Blackhorse et al. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
* Washington Redskins' Trade Marks tackled: disparaging, says District CourtJani writes up Pro-Football Inc v Amanda Blackhorse et al. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 12:10 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
The court says that Alcede needs to change the password and email to one he’s willing to share and then turn over this information to the reorganized debtor. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:20 am
Suleman reviews Case C‑631/13, Arne Forsgren v Österreichisches Patentamt, a decision where the CJEU addressed the issues of whether a Supplementary Protection Certificate (SPC) could be obtained for a product per se in ‘separate’ form when the marketing authorisation was for a medicine in which the product is covalently bonded to other ingredients and whether a SPC could rely on a marketing authorisation which only described the… [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:03 am
Circuit Court of Appeals in Pom Wonderful LLC v Hubbard et al | Biotech inventions: controversies, case law, uncertainties and financing.Never too late 26 [week ending Sunday 28 December] -- Arnold J on Ice cream van design in Whitby Specialist Vehicles v Yorkshire Specialist Vehicles | Adios to positive right of TM in Spain | Costs of Vestergaard Fransen v Bestnet Europe | Irish PTO on slogan TMs |… [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 3:29 pm by Cicely Wilson
To discover the Trooper’s identity, Reynolds filed a Rule 202 petition in the Harris County district court seeking to depose Google, Inc., which hosts the blog, and requesting that Google disclose the contact information of the owner of the blog website. [read post]