Search for: "International Union v. General Electric Co." Results 41 - 60 of 105
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2013, 11:39 am by Schachtman
Special Electric Co., Inc., S209927 Cal. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
Nothing to do with us, mate – Google and Facebook http://t.co/pfKbOL0sLe -> Dotcom Loses Lawyers – Then They Erase All History of Him http://t.co/pU34G2RkGR -> Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2014-11-12: Supreme Court of Canada to rule on role of good faith in co… http://t.co/Uhxaty3mI3 -> blogged: Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2014-11-12 http://t.co/hD2LLSRThd -> Supreme Court of Canada ‘updates’ common law to make good faith an… [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
ECJ clarifies rules relating to notice: K-Swiss Inc v OHIM (Class 46) EU Competitiveness Council resolution against counterfeiting and piracy (Class 46) EU states back three-point anti-piracy plan (Managing Intellectual Property) Fuel cells and wind power lead European patent filings for clean energy technology (Green Patent Blog) More non-minor geographical indicator (GI) amendments published (Class 46) No sign of any Community patent progress, despite Verheugen's optimism (IAM) The… [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 5:26 pm
" Michigan Wisconsin Pipe Line Co., 194 NLRB 569, 470 (1971), et al. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 5:54 pm by Christa Culver
MensingDocket: 09-1039Issue(s): Whether the Eighth Circuit abrogated the Hatch-Waxman Amendments by allowing state tort liability for failure to warn in direct contravention of the Act’s requirement that a generic drug’s labeling be the same as the labeling approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the listed (or branded) drug.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (8th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioner's supplemental briefAmicus brief of… [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:43 pm by Tom Goldstein
------- Title: Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 9:00 am
Astra's Data Exclusivity prevents a European generic launch, until at least 2010.: (Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), Iressa (gefitinib) - Astrazeneca's Indian patent application rejected: (Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), Ziagen (Abacavir Hemisulfate Salt) -GSK's application [872/CAL/98; corresponding to Orange Book listed US6294540] opposed by Indian Network for People living with HIV/ AIDS and then withdrawn by GSK: (Generic… [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 12:12 pm
Burns International Services, 406 U.S. 272 (1972). [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:01 am by Susan Landau
Almost exactly a year after the 2015 attack that disabled the three regional electric power distribution networks, Ukraine suffered another attack on its power grid. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 12:37 pm by Bexis
Local Union No. 110, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, 681 F. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
: Nine v IceTV: (International Law Office)   Benelux Some new rules of the Director-General of the Benelux Organisation for Intellectual Property with regard to trade mark filings refused on absolute grounds and withdrawal of oppositions: (Class 46)   Brazil Brazil exports agricultural technology to developing world: (IP tango)   Canada Conservatives website faces claims of copyright infringement: (Michael Geist), Canada’s trade mark… [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:21 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  Self-insured employers and health insurers generally must begin paying a new fee imposed as part of PPACA. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 12:00 am
: (IPBiz),State of the Union address 28 Jan 2008: statement regarding patenting human life: (IPBiz), (Patently-O),Alnylam Pharmaceuticals secures UK patent covering molecules that affect RNA interference: (SmartBrief),Doha style compulsory licences for exports: The politics…: (Spicy IP),Pushing to compulsory licensing: Pharma companies heading closer to Doha: (Spicy IP),Financial Express on the battle between big pharma companies and the… [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 12:29 pm
Union Pacific Railroad Co., 50 S.W.3d 226, 249 (Mo. 2001); Lopez v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
  “Direct means Direct” generally limits coverage to losses of assets that the insured held in an account for a customer or owned by the insured. [2]   In Cumberland & Erly, LLC v. [read post]