Search for: "J M v. Review Board, et al." Results 41 - 60 of 183
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2009, 5:43 am by The Injustice Must End (TIME) Committee
Dwight Lundgren, Sister JoAnne Talarico, Trinity United Methodist Church, and United Methodist Church, General Board of Church and Society in Support of Petitioner Brief for J. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 8:09 am
., Inc. (30-CA-12855, et al.; 349 NLRB No. 18) Milwaukee, WI Jan. 31, 2007. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Understanding the risk that a judgment for wilful IP infringement may be discharged in bankruptcy (IP Spotlight) As a litigator, Judge Sotomayor handled many trade mark matters (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) Obama Administration confirms support for continuing ACTA negotiations (Michael Geist) (Intellectual Property Watch) US General – Decisions District Court N D Illinois orders production of allegedly privileged documents after in camera review:… [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 7:18 am by Schachtman
Ratner, et al., ten years after beating back the defendants’ Daubert motion in the Allen case, described their literature review and assessment of Mr. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Matter of Lake George Assn. v NYS Adirondack Park Agency2024 NY Slip Op 02356Decided on May 2, 2024Appellate Division, Third DepartmentFisher, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered:May 2, 2024CV-23-0672[*1]In the Matter of The Lake George Association et al., Respondents,vNYS Adirondack Park Agency… [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Matter of Lake George Assn. v NYS Adirondack Park Agency2024 NY Slip Op 02356Decided on May 2, 2024Appellate Division, Third DepartmentFisher, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered:May 2, 2024CV-23-0672[*1]In the Matter of The Lake George Association et al., Respondents,vNYS Adirondack Park Agency… [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 5:55 am by Barbara Bavis
Osborne, Jr., et al., Labor Union Law and Regulation (2003- ) Theodore J. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:03 am
Circuit Court of Appeals in Pom Wonderful LLC v Hubbard et al | Biotech inventions: controversies, case law, uncertainties and financing.Never too late 26 [week ending Sunday 28 December] -- Arnold J on Ice cream van design in Whitby Specialist Vehicles v Yorkshire Specialist Vehicles | Adios to positive right of TM in Spain | Costs of Vestergaard Fransen v Bestnet Europe | Irish PTO on slogan TMs |… [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 10:16 am
Indiana Dept. of Workforce Development, et al, a 17-page opinion, Judge Robb writes:Andrew Miller appeals from the decision of the Indiana Department of Workforce Development Review Board (the "Board") affirming the decision of the Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ"), who found Miller ineligible for unemployment compensation benefits. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm by Bill Marler
A 2019 epidemiological study has revealed that 9.2% of cattle and 18.2% of beef contain the pathogen.[2] Another recent study has estimated that the Gram-negative bacteria is present in up to 16% of North American cattle.[3] In a 2007 study by Stephens et al., Salmonella was isolated from all of the animals sampled, while Escherichia coli O157:H7 was only isolated from 42.5% of the animals.[4] Notably, 94% of oral cavity samples, 94% of hock samples, 88% of perineum samples, 86% of… [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 11:25 am
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.In Precedent Partners I, L.P., et al. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:41 pm by Bill Marler
et al., “Viral shape-shifting: norovirus evasion of the human immune system,” NATURE REVIEWS, MICROBIOLOGY, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 231-239 (March 2010). [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:08 am
After last year’s guidelines on black and white marks, reported by the IPKat here, it is now the turn of trade marks sharing elements with little or no distinctiveness.* Pom Wonderful the tenacious -- in pursuit of trade mark rightsNeil's first post of this year is about Pom Wonderful LLC v Hubbard et al, a decision rendered a few days ago by the 9th U.S. [read post]