Search for: "J. Doe 8"
Results 41 - 60
of 6,254
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2010, 11:01 am
J 4/97, J 12/03, J 25/03, J 14/04, J 7/06, J 8/06). [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
Paragraphs 8 to 10 of the decision in this respect read as follows: “[8] Decision J 14/04 refers to the EPC, which in Chapter II of Part VII sets out the “Information to the public or official authorities”. [read post]
8 May 2020, 5:00 am
Question #1 – J-1 Visa My niece has a J1 visa and some things have occurred and now the sponsor wants to cancel her visa. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 4:01 am
Eve, J.). [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 12:31 am
Most of our readers are familiar with the J&G case, which brought down the firm. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 5:50 am
Thanks to Pamela J. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm
Rather, the declarations and the electronically filed instructions of 23 December 2008, if read together, suggest, if anything, that CPA was going to pay the third renewal fee and surcharge.[7] Thus the Board concludes that the [applicant’s] request for re-establishment of 23 December 2008 does not contain an instruction, explicit or implicit, that the EPO should deduct the third renewal fee and surcharge from the European representative’s account.[8] Turning now to the… [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 8:02 am
German is an official language of the EPO, so the exception of Rule 36(2) does not appear to apply. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 4:05 am
S. 612, 620 (1884) (Harlan, J.) [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 11:28 am
” Absent the omitted language, the certificate does not indicate either that the notary public knew the husband or had ascertained through some form of proof that he was the person described in the prenuptial agreement. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 5:12 am
Using European law and the three-step test, Arnold J analysed whether the 8 second clips could conform to an exception of copyright. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 8:54 am
See post, at 1, 4 (KAVANAUGH, J., concurring); cf. post, at 8−9 (GORSUCH, J., concurring in judgment). [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 3:16 am
It is important to note that the staff’s no-action responses to Rule 14a-8(j) submissions reflect only informal views. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 5:01 pm
At least three of the above-mentioned decisions (see point [7]) finding that R 25(1) EPC 1973 (R 36(1)) does not set a time limit but a condition, namely J 10/01, J 24/03 and J 18/04, were issued well before the notification of the examination report dated 19 July 2006. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
This is in line with decisions T 842/90 and J 20/00 where it was considered possible that the payment of an additional fee amounting to [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 6:40 am
”The law does not address this question. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
This means in the individual situation, not just in general. [8] The Board cannot see how the jurisprudence, cited by the appellant, concerning the proof of prior use of mass products or public availability of commercial brochures could be applied here. [read post]
12 May 2014, 9:57 am
., 1-12-cv-00931 (DED May 8, 2014, Order) (Robinson, J.) [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 6:17 am
Posted by Michael J. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
[8] As to the first question, in the simple case where drawings are referred to in the description but no drawings are filed, the answer will clearly be yes. [read post]
