Search for: "JA v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 213
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2018, 10:50 am
The legal framework governing the LAWS seems not to be that clear and state opinions are divided on the topic. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
17 Mar 2018, 1:04 pm
PISO 3, Carrera 7 # 40b – 36. - Miércoles 21 de marzo: Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Edificio N°95, Manuel Briceño Jáuregui S.J., AUDITORIO JAIME HOYOS VÁSQUEZ S.J. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 7:32 pm
Earlier this month, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled in on this again in R. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:24 am
Instead of veering towards such a transformation, the government decided to rely once again on its preferred model, stimulating growth through investment, exports and subsidies to state-owned enterprises (SOEs), operating outside of China on a regional scale, via BRI. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 6:09 am
State Bar of California, No. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 12:06 am
Trollip JA stated that what was there under consideration was not a disclaimer in the usual form. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 9:34 pm
The Taxi views can be reconciled though with, for instance, the views of Harms JA in Bergkelder Bpk. v Vredendal Koöp Wynmakery [2006] ZASCA 5 (emphasis added). [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 4:50 pm
2005: SEC v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 4:40 pm
And, as Ponnan JA’s deep dive into the position in other jurisdictions shows, Van Breda is now one of the leading global authorities in favour of broadcasting court cases (Ponnan JA considers the legal position in the United States, Canada, England and Wales, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Australia, New Zealand, Germany, Israel and Brazil, and numerous international tribunals). [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 9:03 pm
As one judge stated: “[t]he Court cannot be bound by the semantics that limited fugitive status to fleeing or failing to return when dealing with an international criminal defendant who allegedly violated United States law from abroad. [read post]
Hong Kong: Freedom of the (Entertainment) Press: Part 1, Data Privacy and Public Interest – David Ma
22 Mar 2017, 5:29 pm
” – Wong JA, Eastweek v Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data CACV331/1999 The PDPO has special protection for data users whose businesses consist of news activities in that the Commissioner does not have power, in the absence of a data subject complaint, to initiate an investigation against such data users. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 2:04 pm
The individual certainly cannot travel to the United States and travel elsewhere in the world risks detention and possible extradition to the United States. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 11:55 am
Chen v. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 6:21 am
Stanley v. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 11:52 am
He announced his invention as follows: To all whom it may concern: Be it known that I, Jas. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 5:35 pm
JA asks for a written motion first. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 5:58 am
For example, where a treatment for a disease condition alleviates or reduces the need for surgical operations, hospitalization, or physician time, the expenditure on the medicine must be evaluated from a holistic perspective given that other healthcare costs have been reduced[v]. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 9:21 am
M/V JA Orgeron, 143 F.3d 976, 984 (5th Cir. 1998). [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 8:17 am
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the federal anti-discrimination statute, does not provide much protection in this regard, as a Manhattan federal court made clear several years ago in EEOC v. [read post]
