Search for: "JACKS v. JACKS"
Results 41 - 60
of 4,281
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2024, 2:18 pm
The final brief from Special Counsel Jack L. [read post]
History Shows the Supreme Court Knows How to Move Quickly, as it Should With the Trump Immunity Case
22 Apr 2024, 5:50 am
Trump v. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 7:51 pm
The New Zealand High Court has now decided that, in its view, there is no place for anti-suit injunctions under the TTPA regime: A-Ward Ltd v Raw Metal Corp Pty Ltd [2024] NZHC 736 at [4]. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 2:25 pm
[Defendant standing must exist at all stages of any litigation and must be raised by the justices of the Supreme Court even if the litigants themselves fail to raise it] On Thursday, April 25th the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 3:23 pm
In one case, State of Florida v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:31 am
And in 1982, in Nixon v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 5:55 am
On February 19, 2024, the High Court in London in R (Al-Haq) v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 3:38 am
Conversely, the Artpusher case resulted in a ruling against the gallery, emphasizing that trademark law does not harbor a parody exception akin to that in copyright law, marking a clear boundary for artists and commercial entities alike regarding the use of trademarks in art, especially for commercial purposes.In the Jack Daniel's v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 1:34 pm
He noted that just last week, in Bissonnette v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 12:46 pm
Last month, we filed an amicus brief in United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 1:36 pm
” Jack Healy and Kellen Browning of The New York Times report that “Arizona Reinstates 160-Year-Old Abortion Ban; The state’s highest court said the law, moribund for decades under Roe v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:16 am
Nearly a decade ago, in Yates v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm
” The signatories are Holly Brewer, Rosemarie Zagarri, Jack N. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
The limits of peer review ultimately make it a poor proxy for the validity tests posed by Rules 702 and 703. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
Foran, Discrimination and Manifestation of Belief: Higgs v Farmor's School [2023] EAT 89, (Industrial Law Journal, Forthcoming).Jack M. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
In last year's landmark affirmative action case, SFFA v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 5:06 am
After an appeals court decision gave Special Counsel Jack L. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 11:09 am
Antonin Scalia had an acid tongue ("pure applesauce," "jiggery-pokery"), and he did his share of trolling as well (once responding to a law student's question about Bush v. [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 1:17 am
Quick links Jack Blackburn, The Times: How a 96-year-old law could stop Easter hopping around the calendar. 3PB Barristers, Lexology: Protected beliefs and social media storms: on Omooba v Michael Garrett Associates Ltd (t/a Global Artists) & Anor [2024] EAT 30. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 8:40 am
” Jack Goldsmith and Tom Koenig have this post at the “Lawfare” blog. [read post]
