Search for: "James v. Employment Division" Results 41 - 60 of 380
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2010, 2:11 am
Irresistible impulse as a defense in an administrative disciplinary actionPerry v Comm. of Labor, App. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 5:19 am
 However, the Family Court emphasized that Wife's alleged adultery had no impact on its division of assets.Teeter v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 8:33 am
James Brudney, Joseph Crowley Chair in Labor and Employment Law, Fordham School of Law Prof. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 3:35 am
Public employee not always entitled to a name-clearing hearingBrown v Simmons, 478 F.3d 922The lesson in Brown v Simmons is that a public employee is not entitled to a name-clearing hearing to rebut statements of a defamatory nature except when he or she has been terminated by the employer. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 2:48 am
Modifying a disciplinary penaltyBrown v Penn Yan CSD, 275 AD2d 931Knight v BOCES, App. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 9:43 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
”[v]  Drafting Policies & Using the Right Standard for the Right Circumstances When drafting and applying FMLA and other legally mandated policies, it’s important that employers, employee benefit plan sponsors and administrators and others use the correct standard for the circumstance prevented. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 6:59 pm by Kathy Kapusta
The memo wipes out earlier guidance, including a 2013 memorandum issued by then-Deputy Attorney General James M. [read post]