Search for: "Jeffries v. Jeffries"
Results 41 - 60
of 190
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2012, 1:59 pm
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)In U.S. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 7:12 am
In Ziglar v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 5:23 am
State v. [read post]
6 Feb 2010, 2:31 pm
Bridgette Jeffries, as Guardian for Melvin Eason, An Incapacitated Person v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 10:09 am
" The question raised in United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 8:49 am
On Monday, the Sixth Circuit handed down a decision in United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 6:29 am
When I was asked to contribute a paper on business organization law to the Pepperdine conference, the conference call immediately brought to mind Benjamin Cardozo’s opinion in Meinhard v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 7:04 am
The Second Circuit cites Jeffries v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 5:08 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Lewis v Yeeles [2010] EWCA Civ 326 (29 March 2010) Silvera v Bray Walker Solicitors (A Firm) & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 332 (29 March 2010) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Seymour Pierce Ltd v Grandtop International Holdings Ltd [2010] EWHC 676 (QB) (29 March 2010) High Court (Chancery Division) Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation & Anor v Newzbin Ltd [2010] EWHC 608 (Ch) (29 March 2010) Jeffries… [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 2:58 pm
The Rutgers decision cited a different appellate opinion, Jeffries v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 4:04 pm
The court cites to US v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 8:03 pm
People v Jeffries, 129 AD2d 962). [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 6:45 am
CA6 Home PUBLISHED OPINIONS OpinionShort Title/District 08a0154p.062008/04/15 Jeffries v. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 6:16 am
This case highlights the complexities of constitutional law, as the plaintiffs framed their case under the constitutional right to travel, not the First Amendment.The case is Jeffries v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
**Other decisions in which a public employee's right to free speech was considered include Tytor v Laramie County School District, CA10 [unpublished]; Jeffries v Harleston, CA2, 52 F3d 9; and Barnard v Jackson County, CA8, 43 F3d 1218. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 11:51 pm
In the course of explaining the background law, my column gives the following argument for the rule of Teague v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 3:22 pm
In Foldi v. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 7:03 am
Will Rollins (D) v. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 4:58 am
” Kurz v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 6:42 am
” The Third Circuit in United States v. [read post]
