Search for: "John Doe VII"
Results 41 - 60
of 582
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2016, 8:14 am
John M. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 8:48 am
He was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts, a fellow conservative, who voted with the four members of the liberal wing of the Court. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 2:12 am
Such alleged conduct violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
But Gorsuch makes sure to point out the three ways in which employers can under Title VII and federal law invidiously discriminates against LGBTQ.First, Title VII does permit religious organizations to discriminate based on faith. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 9:28 am
Gorsuch rejected the idea that because Congress did not address sexual orientation or transgender status specifically in Title VII, Title VII does not protect LGBT employees. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 10:12 am
Healthsystem, decided yesterday by Judge John F. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 12:34 pm
The case is John Doe Anti-Terrorism Officer v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 7:24 am
And, by the way, management makes a homophobic comment to John on the day that John is fired. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 1:58 pm
UNSCRs adopted under Chapter VII are very difficult to negotiate with Russia and China, and even more so after the Iraq and Libya conflicts.) [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:55 am
John A. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 7:47 am
Though I must say Sotomayor does a terrible job of explaining this issue. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 6:53 pm
The Act does not have a comparable component to s. 15(2) of the Charter, but Title VII and subsequent amendments empowered the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) to employ similar actions. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 2:05 am
Chief Justice John G. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 2:05 am
Chief Justice John G. [read post]
20 May 2019, 3:30 am
And then it says that [the Religious Freedom Restoration Act] does not apply to any claim under the Equality Act. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 11:22 am
” The rule “rewrites Title VII’s definition of ’similarly situated’ employees,” John C. [read post]
16 May 2011, 12:05 pm
As to the measure of the “high standards of quality and judgment expected of partners at our firm”, how does Ropes & Gray evaluate partners that the EEOC found engaged in violations of Title VII? [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 3:16 am
According to the panel, the manager rule applies to retaliation claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act, which has narrower anti-retaliation protections than does Title VII. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 9:29 am
Or does this practice merely rub salt in our nation's racial woods? [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 4:10 am
A district court granted summary judgment to the defendants, holding their "motivation to avoid making promotions based on a test with a racially disparate impact, even in a political context, does not, as a matter of law, constitute discriminatory intent, and therefore such evidence is insufficient for plaintiffs to prevail on their Title VII claim. [read post]
