Search for: "Johnson v. Abe" Results 41 - 60 of 126
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2009, 3:47 am
  And in Olympic Holding Co. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 5:22 am
Kappos (Patent Docs) US: New York Times provides soapbox for data exclusivity critics (Patent Docs) US: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dismissed as party in RNAi dispute: Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Forderung der Wissenschaften e V et al v Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research et al (Patent Docs) US: Cordis awarded fees and costs in surgical device suit: Marctec v Johnson & Johnson and Cordis Corporation (Patent Docs) US: Review and… [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 5:22 am
Kappos (Patent Docs) US: New York Times provides soapbox for data exclusivity critics (Patent Docs) US: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dismissed as party in RNAi dispute: Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Forderung der Wissenschaften e V et al v Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research et al (Patent Docs) US: Cordis awarded fees and costs in surgical device suit: Marctec v Johnson & Johnson and Cordis Corporation (Patent Docs) US: Review and… [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 2:12 am by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 7 November 2022, judgment was handed down in the case of AB v Chief Constable of British Transport Police [2022] EWHC 2749 (KB) by Mr Justice Johnson. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 7:13 am
The same principle has been applied to applications to amend under section 75 of the 1977 Act: see Sara Lee Household & Body Care UK v Johnson Wax Ltd [2001] FSR 17 and DataCard Corp v Eagle Technologies Ltd [2011] EWHC 244 (Pat) at [226].105. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 6:37 am by Erin Miller
At Concurring Opinions, Tuan Samahon discusses a recently released audiotape indicating that that former Supreme Court Justice Abe Fortas may have lied during his confirmation hearing to be Chief Justice about his discussion of Court matters with his friend President Lyndon Johnson. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 6:57 am by HR Daily Advisor Editorial Staff
Center for American Progress. 2012;16.[2] Meyers MC, van Woerkom M, Bakker AB. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 6:57 am by HR Daily Advisor Editorial Staff
Center for American Progress. 2012;16.[2] Meyers MC, van Woerkom M, Bakker AB. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 3:13 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Monday 25 July and Tuesday 26 July, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal in R (Johnson) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
25 May 2015, 4:15 am
, Paul Inman and Ailsa Carter, have summarised last week's decision from the Court of Appeal in AstraZeneca AB & Another v KRKA dd Novo Mesto & Another [2015] EWCA Civ 484.* F1 ends up in hot water - no similarity to F1H2OIn Case T-55/13 the General Court of the European Union deals with Formula One Licensing BV's opposition against Idea Marketing SA’s Community trade mark application for 'F1H2O'. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 1:45 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R v Golds, heard on 14 June 2016 FirstGroup plc v Paulley, heard on 15 June 2016 R (Hicks & Ors) v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis, heard on 28-29 June 2016 Impact Funding Solutions Ltd v AIG Europe Insurance Ltd, heard on 30 June 2016 R (Ingenious Media Holdings plc & Anor) v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard on 4 Jul 2016 R v Mitchell, heard on 7 July 2016 AB v Her… [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 9:19 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R v Golds, heard on 14 June 2016 FirstGroup plc v Paulley, heard on 15 June 2016 R (Hicks & Ors) v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis, heard on 28-29 June 2016 Impact Funding Solutions Ltd v AIG Europe Insurance Ltd, heard on 30 June 2016 R (Ingenious Media Holdings plc & Anor) v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard on 4 Jul 2016 R v Mitchell, heard on 7 July 2016 AB v Her… [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm by Schachtman
Gislaved Gummi AB, 178 F. 3d 257, 263–264 (4th Cir. 1999) (citing cases); Wells v. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 5:17 pm by INFORRM
In the Courts On 9 June 2014, there was a trial in the case of Johnson v Steele before Dingemans J. [read post]