Search for: "Johnson v. Federal Express Corp." Results 41 - 60 of 262
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
− suggests that federal due process rights likely constrain an interpretation that transforms a run‐of‐the‐mill registration and appointment statute into a corporate “consent” − perhaps unwitting − to the exercise of general jurisdiction by state courts.Brown, slip op. at 42. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Johnson & Johnson, 700 F. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Those arguments are more relevant, and far more prevalent, in non-drug/device cases where the presentation of warnings is not minutely governed by federal law, and unlike prescribing physicians, there are plaintiffs who can’t read English, who have to deal with warnings in workplace settings, or who are just plain knuckleheads in using products. [read post]
31 May 2019, 9:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Long post, lots of stuff to cover in this opinion.MillerCoors, LLC v. [read post]