Search for: "Johnson v. Stevens" Results 41 - 60 of 662
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2017, 3:10 am by Walter Olson
“Baseball rule” win for Yankees at appeals court: “Court Rules Against Fan in New York State Foul-Ball Case” [Zach Spedden, Ballpark Digest] More on the downfall of the $417 million baby powder verdict against Johnson & Johnson [Steven Boranian/Drug & Device Law, Robert H. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 6:50 am
Steven Higginsen, Associate Professor of Law at Loyola College of Law, New Orleans, will then discuss the Powell v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:11 pm
Regardless of what Justices Stevens, Blackmun, and O'Connor said. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 12:15 pm
Johnson (Jerrold Elwin) [Automatic Appeal] (justice pro tempore to be assigned)2:00 P.M.(4) S214221 State of California ex rel. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 5:08 am by Brian A. Comer
This is an update to the post below in which I provided an article about the beginning of the South Carolina Attorney General's lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson about the drug Risperdal. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 8:07 pm
  First, for all those who would prefer to insist that Justice Stevens is easily pegged as a dyed-in-the-wool liberal, the Stevens-Roberts-Kennedy opinion in Crawford v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 7:33 am
Justice John Paul Stevens, joined by Justice Stephen Breyer, dissented (pdf), saying Johnson's situation was "as compelling a case" as he had encountered raising the constitutional concerns that Stevens himself raised in a 1995 dissent from another denial of certiorari: Lackey v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 12:39 pm by Erin Miller
” Justice Stevens’ dissent in Texas v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 4:12 pm
Resource: Johnson and Johnson v Superior Court, Court of Appeal Second District, January 20, 2011 [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 12:57 pm by Howard Wasserman
But really the only surprises there were Scalia and Stevens, who switched places from what was expected (see this post by Sonja West, a former Stevens clerk, on Stevens' Johnson dissent). [read post]