Search for: "Joiner v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 83
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Nov 2013, 7:46 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This case is out of the United States District Court, Southern District of Texas, McAllen Division. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 7:20 am by Schachtman
Earlier this month, a panel of the Seventh Circuit of the United States Court of Appeal decided a relatively straight forward case by reversing the trial court’s exclusion of a forensic accountant’s damages calculation. [read post]
5 May 2013, 12:15 pm by Schachtman
Sanders argues that the Milward opinion is important because it highlights what he characterizes as a “rhetorical conflict that has been ongoing, often below the surface, since the United States Supreme Court’s 1993 opinion in Daubert v. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 12:59 pm by Schachtman
My friend Chris Guzelian thinks that I have jumped the shark in joining with Professors Makuch and Lash in filing an amicus brief in United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2013, 7:23 am by Schachtman
  Some may find irony in the CPR’s past criticism of Citizens United v. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 4:14 pm by Schachtman
United States, 346 F.2d 52, 54 (5th Cir.1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 976 (1966). 615 F. [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:03 am by Schachtman
  In Milward, Justice Stevens’ mischaracterization of WOE and scientific method was adopted as the legal standard for expert witness testimony by a panel of the United States Court of Appeals, for the First Circuit. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:40 pm by Schachtman
Green & Joseph Sanders, “Admissibility Versus Sufficiency: Controlling the Quality of Expert Witness Testimony in the United States,” . [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 6:15 pm
Employment at will DiLacio v New York City District Council of United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of Am., 2011 NY Slip Op 00175, Appellate Division, Second Department In this action George DiLacio, Jr. sued the District Council in an effort to recover damages for alleged wrongful termination of employment and defamation. [read post]