Search for: "Jones v. Black"
Results 41 - 60
of 534
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2019, 3:37 am
” Gilmore & Black §6–20, at 327.But the Jones Act was overtaken in the 1950s by the second fundamental change in personal injury maritime claims—and it was this Court, not Congress, that played the leading role. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:50 am
Black in the syllabus. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 6:57 am
This case generated extensive news coverage in Connecticut, including a good summary of the oral argument in January 2012.The case is Jones v. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 9:07 pm
Today was the deadline for all amici supporting Harris Associates to file their briefs in the Supreme Court case of Jones v. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 1:31 am
Today, 24 January 2019, five Supreme Court judges (Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin) will hear Stocker v Stocker UKSC 2018/0045, an appeal against the 12 February 2018 Court of Appeal decision of Lady Justice Sharp, with whom Lord Justice McFarlane and Sir John Laws concurred ([2018] EWCA Civ 170). [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 12:57 pm
See Hoven v. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 11:00 am
Kraemer, which held that racially restrictive covenants could not be enforced by courts; Jones v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 7:32 am
Kraemer, which held that racially restrictive covenants could not be enforced by courts; Jones v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 7:38 am
Jones v. [read post]
14 Apr 2018, 1:01 am
Supreme Court, he heard the case Brown v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 5:31 am
Jones, 132 S.Ct.945 (2012). [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 7:49 pm
See United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 9:23 am
Judgment Released: April 19, 2011 Link to Judgment The court, citing Black’s Law Dictionary, 7th edition, defined a document as relevant “if it has probative value; if it is logically connected to and tending to prove or disprove a matter in issue. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 5:00 pm
United States, and this Court’s recent opinions in Medina, Miller, and Jones. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 12:08 am
Today, 24 January 2019, five Supreme Court judges (Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin) will hear Stocker v Stocker UKSC 2018/0045, an appeal against the 12 February 2018 Court of Appeal decision of Lady Justice Sharp, with whom Lord Justice McFarlane and Sir John Laws concurred ([2018] EWCA Civ 170). [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 8:13 am
Case Background Chasity Jones (“Jones”), a black woman, wore her hair in short dreadlocks to an interview for a customer service position with a claims processing company (the “Company”). [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 9:20 am
Jones v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 4:04 am
Jones v. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 9:05 am
Jones, J.S.C. has offered additional insight into this issue in the case of Black v. [read post]
