Search for: "Jones v. Producers Service Corp." Results 41 - 60 of 94
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am by Schachtman
Everest Minerals Corp., 362 F. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 10:21 am by Ray Dowd
All of the aforementioned acts represent transactions between a district resident and defendant that have given rise to consequences in the District.DigiProtect USA Corp. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 2:43 pm
He had subpoenaed certified records from internet service providers, which disclosed the Internet Protocol addresses (`IP address’) associated with Ms. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:14 am by Larry Catá Backer
Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 301 U.S. 1 (1937) (federal regulatory power extended to intra state activities that could cumulatively have a substantial effect on commerce);  Heart of Atlanta Motel v. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am by Law Lady
LANE, Appellees. 1st District.Civil procedure -- Service of process -- Foreign corporations -- Service of process on defendant corporation quashed -- Plaintiff attempted to perform substitute service pursuant to incorrect Florida long arm jurisdiction statute -- Further, plaintiff did not strictly comply with requirements for substituted service against domestic corporation, which requires notification by registered or certified mail to defendant after… [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
: (Ars Technica), Google, GE join forces for green tech research, lobbying: (Ars Technica), AIPPI Congress: how to protect you IP rights in virtual worlds (Managing Intellectual Property), Industry still wary of ICANN plan for new top-level internet domains: (Intellectual Property Watch), Ubuntu-Firefox EULA dustup reignites OSS licensing debate: (Ars Technica), Media standard backers attempt Apple-less solo run: (Out-Law), Open Source in Mobile conference: OpenMoko CEO says embrace fragmentation,… [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]