Search for: "Jones v. The People of the State of New York"
Results 41 - 60
of 537
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2012, 8:14 am
Jones v. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 1:02 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 7:04 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 11:22 am
New York v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 8:04 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 7:43 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 4:05 am
” People United For Children, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 5:19 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
The Lower Court Rulings The plaintiff sued the defendant for damages due to her injuries, in New York state court. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 12:47 pm
In People v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:38 pm
City of New York, 40 N.Y.2d 30, 35 [1976]; People v. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 9:40 am
New York v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 7:00 am
” New York State’s Court of Appeals ruled that a warrantless installation of a GPS device to track an individual suspected of criminal activity was barred by New York State’s Constitution, citing People v Weaver, 12 NY3d 433.*** The Weaver court noted that Article 1, §12, of New York State’s Constitution, in addition to tracking the language of the Fourth Amendment of the… [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 7:33 am
Jones, 9 NY3d 259, 262, 848 NYS2d 600 (2007), citing People v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:10 pm
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus NEW YORK STATE RIFLE & PISTOL ASSOCIATION,INC., ET AL. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:10 pm
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus NEW YORK STATE RIFLE & PISTOL ASSOCIATION,INC., ET AL. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 5:02 am
Citing People v Weaver (12 NY3d 433) and United States v Jones (132 S Ct 945}, the Court of Appeals ruled that the State agency's action was a search within the meaning of the State and Federal Constitutions and “did not require a warrant” but “on the facts of this case such surveillance was unreasonable”The decision TLC decision is posted on the Internet… [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 6:17 am
Ferguson, 67 N.Y.2d 383, 390, 494 N.E.2d 77, 81 (1986) The United States Supreme Court explained division of authority in New York v Hill, 528 U.S. 110 (2000):What suffices for waiver depends on the nature of the right at issue. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 12:32 am
United States v. [read post]
