Search for: "Jordan v. Winter"
Results 41 - 55
of 55
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2011, 8:17 am
Jordan Furlong provided an intriguing two part teleseminar update on the Future of the Legal Profession (part 1, part 2). [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 6:13 am
In Thompson v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Blume and Jordan M. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am
I always enjoyed the idea of ‘going into winter quarters’. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 9:09 am
Conflicting cases: Winters v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 1:41 pm
Winter ("On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly denied (1) his motion to dismiss the charge of criminal violation of a protective order and (2) his motion for a judgment of acquittal. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:31 am
Delaware courts have never found a MAE in the context of a merger agreement, and Wolinsky himself helped to litigate the precedent-setting case on the issue, IBP, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 11:33 am
Windows MS Office opinion: Mac Office 2008 sucks v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(Spicy IP) Both Hindi cinema and theatre are accused of copyright infringement by relatives of dead authors (Spicy IP) Dispute between Bisleri and Coca-Cola over ‘Maaza’ trade mark ends up in Delhi High Court (Spicy IP) Geographical indications: the BASMATI wrangle (International Law Office) Foreign geographical indications enter India: (Spicy IP) Trade mark search essential to reveal deceptively similar trade marks (International Law Office) Outsourcing patent related services… [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 9:47 am
.'" Ward v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
On Tuesday, August 19, 2008, PropertyShark.com is sponsoring a Manhattan real-estate networking event at The Madison & Gypsy Tea (27 West 24th Street). [read post]
21 Jul 2006, 8:30 am
That is not the issue of proportionality as such - proportionality as such is the situation where a commander, without any special or extra intent of wanton and depraved destruction, was nonetheless found liable under the laws of war for destruction because the court simply found it disproportionate as such.)The full declaration from which this is drawn can be found on SSRN, here, and the reply declaration to the plaintiffs experts (Michael Reisman and I were experts for the defendant corporations,… [read post]
