Search for: "Judges of U.S. Supreme Court" Results 41 - 60 of 35,130
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2024, 9:15 am
The jury must be unanimous when it comes to determining whether Trump is guilty or not guilty of each specific falsifying business records count, and whether he did so in an effort to unlawfully impact an election, New York Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan said. [read post]
30 May 2024, 4:02 am by SHG
The Constitution, and the federal laws under it, is the “supreme law of the land,” and the recusal statute explicitly treats Supreme Court justices like other judges[.] [read post]
29 May 2024, 4:58 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Canon 4 of the Delaware Judges’ Code of Judicial Conduct permits a judge to engage in “activities to improve the law, the legal system, and the administration of justice. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm by Reference Staff
With a List of Suggested Resources**On June 4, 2020 the Washington Supreme Court issued an open letter to the judiciary and legal community recognizing deep-seated and continuing institutional racial injustice and calling for action to address systemic inequities. [read post]
29 May 2024, 10:17 am by Alden Abbott
Supreme Court’s teaching, since 1979, that the antitrust laws are designed to promote consumer welfare. [read post]
28 May 2024, 3:27 am by Will Newman
Supreme Court, decided cases brought pursuant to a particular statute brought by private parties, a litigant argued the law did not permit those lawsuits. [read post]
27 May 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Here is a summary of the key language from the majority opinion by Judge Rivera:As we explained in U.S. [read post]
  Justice Brett Kavanaugh alluded to this possibility in a dissent to the Supreme Court’s 2023 Helix decision. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:49 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit and the Supreme Court itself. [read post]
24 May 2024, 4:45 am by Eric B. Meyer
” Indeed, the Supreme Court has recognized that the First Amendment protects an employer’s right to make specific predictions about the effects of unionization on the business and broadcast its general views on unionization. [read post]
24 May 2024, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
Bradley Wendel.]A new Supreme Court judicial ethics controversy involves . . . another flag. [read post]