Search for: "June v. Secretary of Navy"
Results 41 - 60
of 67
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
Ed. 1153May 12-13, 1952, Argued June 2, 1952, Decided [Available at: http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/343/579]MR. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 8:23 am
Behold United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 11:00 am
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces demonstrated in U.S. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 10:14 am
Last week Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel announced that the Armed Forces (Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, Coast Guard) will comply with the U.S. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 12:26 pm
Dep't of the Navy (salmon, protection of species)Fine Consulting, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 5:39 am
The Supreme Court Thursday is expected to issue arguably the most anticipated decision since 2000's Bush v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 2:08 pm
., v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm
Earlier today, I had the pleasure of visiting Professor Jack Goldsmith’s “Foreign Relations Law” class, which is studying Hamdan v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 1:30 pm
The President, the Vice President, the National Security Adviser, the Vice President’s national security adviser, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Homeland Security — are themselves all lawyers. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 10:51 am
(June 14, 1991) (presented by plaintiffs’ counsel Jim Pettit, of Greitzer & Locks), in Radcliff v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 5:53 am
Code § 375 – extended the Act’s prohibitions to members of the Navy and Marine Corps. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 3:56 pm
The case is Lebron, et al., v. [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 8:57 am
” The Japan Times report indicates that the Secretary of the Navy approved LCDR Velasquez’s dismissal on 20 October 2010. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 6:05 pm
STRAHAN v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 1:22 pm
If this doesn't call for more organization, control and assets -- like, subsea mapping by the Navy, for instance -- then nothing does. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
United States, 321 F.3d 1134 (2003) (joining panel opinion by Randolph, J., along with Williams, J., holding that federal district court lacked habeas corpus jurisdiction over Guantanamo detainees under existing Supreme Court precedent), rehearing en banc denied without dissent (June 2, 2003), rev’d sub nom. [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
Click Here California Appeals Court Affirms Lower Court Holding in Goodrich v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 7:14 am
In McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 10:46 am
Danzig v. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 2:24 pm
The petition was granted on June 16, 2008. [read post]
