Search for: "KBR" Results 41 - 60 of 678
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Nov 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Mastercard Incorporated & Ors v Walter Hugh Merricks CBE, heard 13 and 14 May 2019 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 ABC (AP) v Principal Reporter & Anor (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019 In… [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 1:00 am by Jocelyn Hutton
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Mastercard Incorporated & Ors v Walter Hugh Merricks CBE, heard 13 and 14 May 2019 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 Halliburton Company v Chubb Bermuda Insurance Ltd (Formerly known as Ace Bermuda… [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Mastercard Incorporated & Ors v Walter Hugh Merricks CBE, heard 13 and 14 May 2019 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, heard 27 June 2019 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial… [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, heard 27 June 2019 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 Halliburton Company v Chubb Bermuda… [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, heard 27 June 2019 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 Halliburton Company v Chubb Bermuda… [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Tuesday 13 October, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of  R (on the application of KBR, Inc) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 8:23 am by David Cosgrove
In that case, the SEC charged Houston-based technology and engineering firm, KBR, with violating whistleblower protection Rule 21F-17 enacted under Dodd-Frank. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 4:25 am by Tom Kosakowski
Hill retired in 2018 after serving as Ombudsman and Manager of the Dispute Resolution Program at KBR, Inc. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 10:00 am by Legal Profession Prof
The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has limited the taxable costs sought and obtained in the District Court by prevailing party Kellogg Brown & Root The discovery response To process Barko’s document requests, KBR... [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 10:31 am by Schachtman
KBR, Inc., Case 3:09-cv-00632-PK, Slip op. at 6-7 (D. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 11:40 am by luiza
Enforcement actions like those against Collectors’ Café or KBR go further, however, by actively punishing and deterring companies from trying to stifle individuals who report illicit activity or misconduct. [read post]
For example, the SFO expects that the company will: make accountants available to explain what financial records mean; provide relevant material that is held abroad where it is in the possession or under the control of the organisation (which goes further than the recent KBR case, which is currently being appealed); preserve means of reading digital files over the life of the investigation and any prosecution and appeal (which could be an extremely expensive undertaking); assist in… [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 2:30 am by Tinker Ready
In 2015, KBR was ordered by the Justice Department to pay $100,000 fine for improperly accepting “gifts and gratuities, including expensive dinners, golf outings and event tickets from various sub-contractors while KBR was providing logistic services in Iraq. [read post]
KBR Inc. is appealing the judgment in R (on the application of KBR Inc) v The Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2018] EWHC 2012 (Admin) (KBR v SFO), in which the Administrative Court held that section 2(3) of the Criminal Justice Act 1987 (CJA), which (broadly) gives the SFO power to require a person to produce specified documents in connection with an SFO investigation, has certain extra-territorial effect. [read post]
In KBR, it was held that a notice under s 2(3) of the Criminal Justice Act 1987 (CJA) has extraterritorial effect where there is a “sufficient connection” between the overseas company and the UK (see here for our blog on that case). [read post]