Search for: "KEY v. LONDON"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,050
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2024, 1:01 am
In R (GH) v The Mayor of London [2024] EWHC 1305 (Admin), the claimants, Charedi Orthodox children, sought permission to apply for judicial review of the decision of the Mayor of London to extend his Universal Free School Meals scheme for the academic year 2024-2025 but to continue to confine the scheme to state-funded primary schools. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 11:32 am
London-Sire Records, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 11:32 am
London-Sire Records, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 11:32 am
London-Sire Records, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 9:57 am
Each document also is given a unique number keyed to the bundle in which it appears. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 9:16 am
In Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s London v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 5:00 am
With respect to ACLU v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 1:07 pm
A key point is the introduction of ‘Unlawful Profit Orders’, which get around the decision of the Court of Appeal in Sumal v Newham London Borough Council [2012] EWCA Crim 1840 that confiscation of rent was not possible because ‘the continued receipt of the rent was not the product of the appellants crime’. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 1:07 pm
A key point is the introduction of ‘Unlawful Profit Orders’, which get around the decision of the Court of Appeal in Sumal v Newham London Borough Council [2012] EWCA Crim 1840 that confiscation of rent was not possible because ‘the continued receipt of the rent was not the product of the appellants crime’. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
Haier II "is to be welcomed in its entirety" as much-needed clarification.Some of the key facts in Nokia v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 1:59 am
They say timing is everything and it certainly was when the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in ClientEarth v The Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs [2015] UKSC 28 on 29 April 2015. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 5:29 pm
A long-running saga came to an end at the High Court in London on 7 October 2011, in Adelson v Anderson [2011] EWHC 2497 (QB). [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 7:59 am
Holdings, Ltd. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 4:13 pm
In the case of David v Hosany [2017] EWHC 2787 (QB), His Honour Judge Moloney QC considered a libel claim brought by the claimant, a Governor of the East London Foundation NHS Trust, in respect of three publications by the defendant, another Governor of the same Trust. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 6:53 am
The key issue before the courts in these cases is therefore whether the breach of an express term committed in connection with an employee’s dismissal falls within the principle established in Johnson V Unisys Ltd [2001] UKHL 13 (that is, an employee may not claim damages for breach of the implied term of trust and confidence where the circumstances that gave rise to the breach related only to the manner in which the employee had been dismissed, referred to as the… [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 7:21 am
Nokia battlemap and, in the same post, provided a recap of the key events. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 12:11 am
"The key issue for infringement was whether there was use in relation to clothing.Nike argued that:the origin of the advertised goods was clear thanks to the Swooshthe average consumer would perceive LDNR as meaning Londoner and not as referring to the origin of the goods. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 4:07 am
Then after a chilli salmon sandwich it’s R v London Borough of Newham and another in Court 1 where counsel, well into extra time, is throwing the kitchen sink at the issues of housing, human rights and statutory interpretation. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 7:15 am
Board of Education and Tinker v. [read post]
25 May 2009, 4:24 am
In Franks v. [read post]
