Search for: "Kansas, State of, v. United States Department of Defense"
Results 41 - 60
of 139
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2014, 5:07 am
Department of Defense already follows a “state of celebration” rule for military spouses. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 7:15 am
Michigan Department of the Treasury. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
It was this nationalistic Hamiltonian mode that found its way into the United States Reports through Chief Justice John Marshall’s opinion for the Court in McCulloch v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 3:51 am
This § 207(p)(1) exemption has been addressed in two opinion letter rulings issued by the United States Department of Labor on November 19, 1992 and in a third opinion letter ruling issued December 31, 2007. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Kansas (No. 18-6135) Argument date 10/7: The question presented is whether the VIII and XIV Amendments permit states to abolish the insanity defense. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 8:18 pm
The Kansas Senate Judiciary Committee will review a proposal to repeal Kansas’ death penalty law this week. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 1:34 pm
What makes this case especially interesting is that the employer had previously lost such a case in Kansas earlier in 2011 and had settled a similar case with the United States Department of Labor. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 12:50 pm
” Georgia v. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 7:15 am
Rodriguez cites, among other cases, United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 9:42 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 6:04 am
That’s because those agencies issued guidance after the Supreme Court’s 2013 United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
The lawsuit charges he “is wrongfully retaining Presidential records that are the property of the United States, and which constitute part of the permanent historical record of the prior administration. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:15 am
Carr, Kansas v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 8:40 am
Lastly, United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 9:53 am
It is the only part of the Necessary and Proper Clause quoted by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 9:06 pm
The Austin-based federal Western District Court for Texas found the United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am
United States, 17-6540, Orr v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 6:15 am
In 2020, the proposal was vetted by the federal interagency Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), which is comprised of representatives from 16 U.S. departments and agencies, including Treasury, Justice, Commerce, Defense, Energy, and Homeland Security. [read post]
