Search for: "Keith A. Little v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 214
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Sep 2020, 7:40 pm by Keith E. Whittington
As with many executive orders issued by this president, this one might be a lot of public relations fanfare with very little policy punch. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 1:43 pm by Sandy Levinson
  But his skepticism about oaths certainly extends to quasi-religious oaths like those exacted from the President and, under Article VI, all public officials, whether state or national. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 1:46 pm by Keith E. Whittington
Virginia has now become the 38th state to vote to ratify the Equal Rights Amendment, which arguably crosses the ratification threshold set out in Article V of the U.S. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 4:21 pm by INFORRM
Associated Newspapers Limited was represented by Andrew Caldecott QC (5RB), Ben Gallop (5RB) instructed by Keith Mathieson of RPC. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 9:05 pm by Milad Emamian
” In its 2018 decision in Ohio v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:14 am by Carolina Attorneys
Attorney General Josh Stein, by Special Deputy Attorney General Keith Clayton, for the State-Appellee. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 5:08 am by Susan Landau
The private sector has become the biggest repository of consumers’ private data with little or no reaction by the people concerned. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 9:10 am by Schachtman
The trial court decided the challenge based upon the Downing case, which was the law in the Third Circuit, before the Supreme Court decided Daubert.[6] The Downing case allowed some opportunity for consideration of reliability and validity concerns; there is, however, disappointingly little discussion of any actual validity concerns in the courts’ opinions. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 8:32 am by John Elwood
Remember United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 10:45 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Keith Eric Wood The State of Michigan Court of Appeals issued an opinion in People v. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm by Schachtman
To be sure, Rothman did target statistical significance as a strict criterion of causal inference, but there is little support in the brief for the loosey-goosey style of causal claiming that is so prevalent among lawyers for the litigation industry. [read post]