Search for: "Kelly v. Administrator" Results 41 - 60 of 663
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
.), entered December 22, 2022, which denied the petition to annul respondents' determination, dated November 10, 2021, denying petitioner's application for accidental disability benefits (ADR), and dismissing the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, unanimously affirmed, without costs.Petitioner did not sustain his burden of showing that his injuries resulted from an accident within the meaning of Administrative Code of City of NY § 13-252, rather than the… [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Citing Matter of Freeman v Ward , 162 AD2d 127, leave to appeal denied 76 NY2d 706, the court explained that the Hearing Officer was free to credit the witnesses' testimony corroborating the child's statements, since weighing the evidence and choosing between conflicting accounts was solely within the province of the administrative agency. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Citing Matter of Freeman v Ward , 162 AD2d 127, leave to appeal denied 76 NY2d 706, the court explained that the Hearing Officer was free to credit the witnesses' testimony corroborating the child's statements, since weighing the evidence and choosing between conflicting accounts was solely within the province of the administrative agency. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In Kelly v Levin, 81 AD2d 1005, the court ruled that acquitting an employee in an administrative disciplinary action based on the same charges underlying the individual's  criminal conviction was a reversible error because the standard of proof in the criminal action was greater. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 9:49 am by Pulgini & Norton, LLP
The Massachusetts Reviewing Board of Industrial Accidents recently reviewed an administrative judge’s denial of benefits in a workers’ compensation appeal in Kelly Anne Martinson v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
”As to the penalty imposed by the appointing authority, termination, the court said that “under the circumstances,” such a penalty did not shock one's conscience or sense of fairness, citing Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32.The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2016/2016_01775.htm___________________ A Reasonable Penalty Under The Circumstances - a 618-page volume focusing on New York State court and… [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 2:54 am
Police officer’s September 11 line of duty injury claim rejectedMatter of Teran v Kelly, 2007 NY Slip Op 30009(U), March 1, 2007, Supreme Court, New York County, Docket Number: 0109358, Judge: Marcy S. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Notably, the petitioner did not testify that she had directed any of her aides to specifically supervise the student at the time of the incident.Under these circumstances, substantial evidence supports the determination of the Justice Center that the petitioner committed category three neglect (see Matter of Williams v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 151 AD3d at 1356-1357; see also Matter of Kelly v New York State Justice… [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 8:48 am
By Kelly HollowellUnder Section 134 of the Patent Act of 1952, if a patent application is denied by the USPTO, the applicant may file an administrative appeal with the PTO’s Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, with appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit under Section141. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 8:48 am
By Kelly HollowellUnder Section 134 of the Patent Act of 1952, if a patent application is denied by the USPTO, the applicant may file an administrative appeal with the PTO’s Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, with appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit under Section141. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 8:27 am
Both former officers were facing terms of life imprisonment at the time of petitioner's administrative hearing but had not been sentenced. [read post]