Search for: "Kind v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 9,407
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
For the purposes of this Article, an offence shall be considered an extraditable offence: (a) regardless of whether the laws in the requesting and requested States place the offence within the same category of offences or describe the offence by the same terminology; (b) regardless of whether the offence is one for which United States federal law requires the showing of such matters as interstate transportation, or use of the mails or of other… [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 11:53 am
United States on jurisdictional grounds is a far better way of deciding Trump v. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 7:23 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 1:37 am
The Supreme Court took this case in United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 2:00 am
United States and Collins v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 8:47 am
As I’ll show, United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 1:59 pm
United States. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 12:01 am
United States, 99 Fed. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 9:30 pm
After all, the Supremacy Clause makes the Constitution, treaties and laws of the United States supreme over state law, and while an agency regulation can plausibly be described as a "law" of the United States, it is hard to see how the exercise of prosecutorial discretion is a kind of federal "law" that preempts state law. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 10:22 am
United States was hazy. [read post]
14 May 2009, 9:51 pm
United States, 221 U.S. 1 (1911) the Supreme Court of the United States found Standard Oil guilty of entering into contracts in restraint of trade and monopolizing the petroleum industry through a long convoluted series of anticompetitive actions. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 3:40 am
In two previous blogs, here and here , we have discussed the United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 1:06 am
In Bullock v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 1:06 am
In Bullock v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 1:06 am
In Bullock v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 5:00 am
We are discussing Citizens United v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 6:15 pm
The forms (and thus the requirements) are all aimed at people entering the United States lawfully, or who have access to some path to lawful presence. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 8:51 pm
United States and Kahn v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:11 am
If one considers the six characteristics enumerated by Brzezinski and Friedrich, not a single one of them obtains in the United States. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 12:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
