Search for: "King v. Clements" Results 41 - 58 of 58
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2010, 7:57 am by Erin Miller
At Slate’s Breakfast Table, Paul Clement notes that the ruling in the patent case Bilski v. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 4:51 pm by Brandon Duke
The panel for this argument included Judges King, Elrod, and Southwick. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 10:52 pm by Jeff Nowak
West Publishing Corp.: checking in with plaintiff on sales leads he was expected to generate during leave also evidence of interference (plaintiff prevailed at trial) King v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 10:14 am by Law Shucks
Should you ever run into Phil Anker of WilmerHale (KPMG) or Paul Clement of King & Spalding (PWC), you should buy them drinks with the money your firms save on malpractice insurance (and presumably pass along in the form of higher distributions and salaries, right?). [read post]
23 Oct 2010, 12:17 pm by law shucks
Should you ever run into Phil Anker of Wilmer Hale (KPMG) or Paul Clement of King & Spalding (PWC), you should buy them drinks with the money your firms save on malpractice insurance (and presumably pass along in the form of higher distributions and salaries, right?). [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP Down… [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 4:32 pm by Mark Walsh
And Paul Clement, now of the boutique firm Clement & Murphy, is seated at the second case counsel table to await argument in Helix Energy Solutions Group v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 8:51 am by Keith Lee
In the matter of Paper v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 11:35 am by David Kopel
Clement, the winning attorney in Bruen, joined the board of the Bradley Foundation in 2020. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 11:11 am by Amy Howe
She was poised even when she was being peppered with questions from all sides of the bench, as she was in defending an ultimately unsuccessful position in her first argument, in Begay v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:29 am by Andrew Hamm
The following is a series of questions prompted by the forthcoming publication of Michael Bobelian’s “Battle for the Marble Palace: Abe Fortas, Earl Warren, Lyndon Johnson, Richard Nixon, and the Forging of the Modern Supreme Court” (Schaffner Press, 2019). [read post]