Search for: "King v. Stuart"
Results 41 - 60
of 89
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
” In Canada, Southin J. in the British Columbia Supreme Court noted in 1986 that “the proclamation of the Charter [of Rights and Freedoms] by a process worthy of an alchemist, has transformed judges from lawyers into philosopher kings…”[21] In light of these views, one might expect that the explicit mention of philosophers would occur most frequently in the context of constitutional law. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 1:41 pm
Heller and McDonald v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 12:58 pm
" English supporters of restoring the Stuarts would pass a wine glass over a water jug while drinking a toast to the health of the king, as a clandestine symbol that one is actually toasting the "King over the Water," which is to say the Pretender, who lived in exile in France. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 4:30 am
Read Stuart Rudner's post Deconstructing Constructive Dismissal to find out. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 5:30 pm
In Odom v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 1:24 am
Evid. 801(c) and 803; Safer, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 3:38 am
The Church may have “won” in Snyder v. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 9:31 am
Many commentators, including my good friends Randy Barnett and Larry Solum, have praised Justice Scalia's opinion in Heller v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 2:35 pm
Rev. 1 (2012) 4 86 Chien, Colleen V. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 12:22 pm
Turns out it’s short for “qui tam pro domino rege quam pro se ipso in hac parte sequitur” – roughly, “who sues in this matter for the king as well as for himself. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 3:30 am
Quick links Catherine Arnold, INFORRM’S Blog: Case Law, Strasbourg: Zemmour v France, Journalist’s conviction for inciting discrimination did not breach Article 10. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 4:10 pm
The Brodies websit had a piece entitled “Stuart Campbell v Kezia Dugdale and the defence of fair comment for defamation in Scotland“. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 8:33 am
The word is rich with meaning, meaning that shifts subtly over the long arc of its engagement with the cultures that have used the word as the sign toward which meaning (and metaphor) could be attached.impeach (v.)formerly also empeach, late 14c., empechen, "to impede, hinder, prevent;" early 15c., "cause to be stuck, run (a ship) aground," also "prevent (from doing something)," from Anglo-French empecher, Old French empeechier "to hinder,… [read post]
5 May 2019, 4:41 pm
Scotland In the case of Campbell v Dugdale [2019] ScotSC 32 the Sheriff’s Court dismissed a libel action against MSP Kezia Dugdale over an allegation that blogger Stuart Campbell had posted “homophobic tweets”. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 4:30 pm
Durham, Chief Marketing and Business Development Officer, McGuireWoods LLP Katherine D'Urso, Chief Marketing Officer, King & Spalding Mark C. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 5:53 am
Ravens v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 1:27 am
Chair of Law Martin Luther King Jr. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 6:10 am
Daniel O’Connor, Daniel V. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am
Mischon de Reya has a blog post analysing the implications of the first civil claim for sexual “image-based abuse” in the recently decided case of FGX v Stuart Gaunt [2023] EWHC 419 (KB). [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 9:00 am
Stuart, 427 U.S. 539, 559 (1976) — would be unconstitutional, too, at least if (as here) it is not limited to speech that fits within an exception. [read post]
