Search for: "Knowles v. US"
Results 41 - 60
of 386
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2013, 5:00 am
Knowles, 133 S.Ct. 1345 (2013), discussed in this blog post. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 3:26 am
McKnight v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 6:14 am
Knowles, supra. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 4:57 pm
In an opinion by Justice Breyer, the Court unanimously rejected a stipulation by a proposed class representative to limit recovery for the putative class to less than $5 million, in an apparent attempt by plaintiffs to avoid removal to federal... [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
American Express v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 9:30 pm
Knowles, “May It Please the Court? [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 4:13 pm
Knowles' patents were found valid and infringed by MemsTech's importation. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:12 pm
Virtually identical to the two cases here is the high court's unanimous decision in Knowles v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 3:00 am
Deaver v. [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 6:47 am
The judgment in ABC v Google Inc ([2018] EWHC 137 (QB)), handed down on 1 February 2018, provides some useful procedural reminders for individuals seeking to the Courts to enforce the “right to delist” (otherwise known as the “right to be forgotten”) against Google. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 2:22 am
The trial judge held that he was bound to follow the approach adopted by the House of Lords in the cases of Cookson v Knowles [1979] AC 556 and Graham v Dodds [1983] 1 WLR 808 and to calculate the multiplier from the date of death. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 4:41 pm
In Knowles (Warden) v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 9:26 pm
USA, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:00 am
With free legal aid from National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Geary filed a federal complaint arguing the union infringed on her constitutionally protected rights under the foundation-won CWA v. [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 4:15 am
State v. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 8:33 pm
In Ottah v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 11:12 am
See Housey Pharm., Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 7:12 am
An employer that allegedly subjected around 500 Indian workers to intolerable conditions, abuse, and substandard pay was not entitled to information relating to their immigration status because such information has an inherently in terrorem effect, a federal district magistrate judge in Louisiana ruled (EEOC v Signal International, LLC, September 10, 2013, Knowles, D, III). [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:34 pm
The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: Bull v Desporte, heard 25 to 28 March 2019 (Julian Knowles J) Sadik v Sadik, heard 2 April 2019 (Julian Knowles J). [read post]
