Search for: "LANGE v. USA" Results 41 - 60 of 87
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2019, 6:02 am by Thorsten Bausch
This means that it was null and of no effect: see, if authority were needed, R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51, para 119. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 12:50 am by Cheryl Beise
Finally, the Board did not abuse its discretion by declining to consider an untimely argument made by the petitioner (Henny Penny Corporation v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 1:53 am by Brian Craig
The Federal Circuit reversed the Board’s construction for the term “wherein the correspondence of blocks to zones is adjustable by controller” in the patent claims and the Board’s conclusion about a limitation in the patent claims based on prior art references (Innovative Memory Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2019, 6:47 am by Cheryl Beise
The Board’s obviousness finding predicated on erroneous claim construction was reversed and the case remanded (MTD Products Inc. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 11:04 am by Goldfinger Injury Lawyers
  Lang J provides an overview of the factors to consider the amount to award in an FLA claim (at para 971), which include:   1) the age, mental and physical condition of claimant;   2) whether the deceased lived with the claim [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 11:56 pm by Matt Pavich
In an unpublished opinion, the appellate court affirmed a district court’s finding that the franchisor had a likelihood of success at trial and would be irreparably harmed absent a preliminary injunction barring the franchisee from setting up a competing ice cream parlor (Handel’s Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 6:09 am by Peter Reap
In addition, the lower court’s judgment was vacated and remanded for a new trial on its compensatory damages award, the jury’s willfulness finding, and the court’s enhanced damages and attorney fees award (Omega Patents, LLC v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 3:43 am by George Basharis
More from our authors: Vissers Annotated European Patent Convention by Derk Visser, Laurence Lai, Peter de Lange, Kaisa Suominen€ 105 Patent Law Injunctions by Rafal Sikorski€ 181 [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 6:57 pm by Thomas Long
More from our authors: Vissers Annotated European Patent Convention by Derk Visser, Laurence Lai, Peter de Lange, Kaisa Suominen€ 105 Patent Law Injunctions by Rafal Sikorski€ 181 [read post]
9 Mar 2019, 6:21 am by George Basharis
More from our authors: Vissers Annotated European Patent Convention by Derk Visser, Laurence Lai, Peter de Lange, Kaisa Suominen€ 105 Patent Law Injunctions by Rafal Sikorski€ 181 [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 3:52 am by Thomas Long
More from our authors: Vissers Annotated European Patent Convention by Derk Visser, Laurence Lai, Peter de Lange, Kaisa Suominen€ 105 Patent Law Injunctions by Rafal Sikorski€ 181 [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 8:19 pm by Thomas Long
More from our authors: Vissers Annotated European Patent Convention by Derk Visser, Laurence Lai, Peter de Lange, Kaisa Suominen€ 105 Patent Law Injunctions by Rafal Sikorski€ 181 [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 4:21 am by Brian Craig
Additionally, the appeals court held that the claims merely recite steps that do not amount to anything more than an instruction to apply the abstract idea of filtering nonconforming data and regenerating a file without it (Glasswall Solutions Ltd. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2018, 5:21 pm by Linda Panszczyk
The district court rejected the plaintiff’s proposed claim construction and arguments but indicated that the plaintiff’s legal attempts were not so meritless as to render the case exceptional for purposes of the Patent Act’s fee shifting provision (Spineology, Inc. v. [read post]