Search for: "LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES" Results 41 - 60 of 284
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2009, 9:19 pm
The 10th held that retired AT&T employees lacked standing to assert an ERISA claim against AT&T after their retirement benefits were transferred to AT&T spin-off Lucent Technologies and... [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 9:53 pm
By Donald Zuhn -- On Tuesday, Senator Arlen Spector (R-PA) (at right), the ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, sent a letter to Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-VT), requesting that the Senate patent reform bill (S. 515) "not be placed on the Executive Business Agenda until late May, after the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has the opportunity to hear argument in Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 10:28 pm
In a case brought by Alcatel-Lucent regarding two of its MP3 digital music file standard patents, the jury determined that Microsoft infringed the plaintiff's patents, rejecting Microsoft's argument that it had previously paid $16 million for a license for the technology from Fraunhofer Gesellschaft and that it had a right to continue to use the licensed technology in its products. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 3:53 am
As reported back in February on the DDIP blog, a jury awarded Alcatel-Lucent just over $1.5 billion in damages, determining that Microsoft infringed two of the plaintiff's MP3 digital music file standard patents, rejecting Microsoft's argument that it had previously paid $16 million for a license for the technology from Fraunhofer Gesellschaft and that it had a right to continue to use the licensed technology in its products. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 12:37 pm by Erin Miller
Lucent Technologies, which challenges the evidentiary standards in patent infringement trials; and Stolaj v. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 9:05 pm
"A federal jury in San Diego [Thursday] ordered Microsoft to pay $1.52 billion to Alcatel-Lucent for violating two patents for a technology used by hundreds of companies that allows users to play digital music on computers, cellphones and other portable devices. [read post]
8 May 2008, 11:00 pm
Lucent sued Microsoft, Gateway, and Dell for infringing 5,649,131 and 4,701,954, claiming two very different technologies. '131 claims a communications protocol between a web server (host) and a terminal. '954 is for digitizing speech. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:07 pm
International Trade Commission by Alcatel-Lucent over technology to identify and affiliate a user in a telephone network. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 6:26 pm
International Trade Commission by Alcatel-Lucent over technology to identify and affiliate a user in a telephone network. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 2:55 pm
Microsoft has won a reversal of a $1.5 billion jury verdict against it for infringing on a patent for MP3 technology held by Alcatel-Lucent. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 6:04 am
Thursday, a jury in a Federal San Diego courtroom found Microsoft liable for infringing Alcatel-Lucent patented audio technology to the tune of $1.52 billion. [read post]
4 Dec 2006, 4:04 am
Shares of Agere, spun off from telecommunications giant Lucent Technologies in 2002, jumped nearly 13 percent in early trading. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 3:10 pm by Eric Guttag
For example, Microsoft recently dodged a $357 million jury award bullet in Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 12:45 pm
The patents govern technology that converts audio input into MPEG-1 Audio Layer 3, more commonly known as MP3, which Microsoft has incorporated into [read post]
9 May 2008, 10:15 am
A federal appeals court reinstated one of two patent cases tossed out last year in the ongoing user-interface technology dispute pitting Alcatel-Lucent against Microsoft and Dell. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 5:10 am
" From the article: "Alcatel-Lucent sued Microsoft over audio-file technology that the software giant first included in its Windows operating system in 1998 and later built into its Windows Media Player. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 9:41 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Of the CAFC decision on 12 April 2010 in SIRF Technology v. [read post]