Search for: "Lagarde v. Lagarde" Results 41 - 55 of 55
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2015, 3:56 am
 This is what Christian writes:One more 'Greenworld' is one too manyIn Case T-106/14 Universal Utility International GmbH & Co.KG v OHIM, the General Court of the European Union decided on the registrability of the word mark GREENWORLD. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 4:53 am
 It's Case C-657/11 Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology (BEST) v Bert Peelaers and Visys NV. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 6:04 am by Matthias Weller
  Opening by a quote from the General Course of 1986 by Paul Lagarde for the Hague Academy of International Law „ ‘The principle of proximity … is nearest to life and is a title of nobility. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 12:09 pm by Jordan Brunner
Elena Chachko discussed EU sanctions and international humanitarian law in her examination of the Court of Justice of the European Union case, A v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 2:44 pm
Some marks are always likely to get into trouble, though: Laetitia Lagarde tells us about one of them -- 'GEL NAILS AT HOME', for nail care products.One thousand up. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 1:25 am by Gilles Cuniberti
Réflexions à propos du contrat d’assurance Paul LAGARDE (Université Paris I)La fraude en matière de nationalité Pierre MAYER (Université Paris I)Le poids des témoignages dans l’arbitrage international Horatia MUIR WATT (Sciences Po)L’émergence du réseau et le droit international privé Marie-Laure NIBOYET (Université Paris Ouest Nanterre la Défense)Les remèdes à la… [read post]
22 Sep 2013, 6:59 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
Scientific Coordination : Jean-Sylvestre Bergé, Stéphanie Francq et Miguel Gardeñes Santiago Administrative Manager : Véronique Gervasoni, Équipe de Droit International, Européen et Comparé (EA n° 4185). [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 4:16 pm by Charon QC
This week also brought ‘Fisting’ to the fore on twitter: Obscenity trial – the law is not suitable for a digital age Myles Jackman in the Guardian: “I welcome the jury’s verdict but the OPA means the state is still capable of acting as a voyeur in the bedroom” I need not trouble you with the facts of R v Peacock. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
So many people have been emailing the IPKat to ask him if he has seen yesterday's General Court decision in Case T-332/10 Viaguara v OHIM - Pfizer (VIAGUARA) that he's beginning to worry if they are trying to tell him something. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 5:42 am by Jonathan Fitchen
This minority view was based on a different interpretation of the facts and on the Giuliano and Lagarde Report on the Convention on the law applicable to contractual obligations (OJ EU No C 282-1). [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 5:00 pm by José Guillermo
COMENTARIO Obviamente para la japonesa y sus técnicos los jubilados, los aportantes y los cercanos a la jubilación son una minoría indeseable por la cual no se deben preocupar, primero; los jubilados son una minoría prescindible e incluso propiciar rápidamente su muerte tal y como declarara la señora Presidenta del FMI Christine Lagarde “los viejos están viviendo mucho tenemos que hacer  algo al respecto” espero lo… [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm by Ron Coleman
Welcome to Blawg Review #325 — 325-and-a-tenth, to be exact. [read post]