Search for: "Landmark Engineering, Ltd." Results 41 - 57 of 57
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2011, 6:06 pm by Marie Louise
Global Global – General Lessig at CERN: Scientific knowledge should not be reserved for academic elite (IP Watch) Global – Copyright Music copyright and public relations, an uphill battle with the occasional easy target: Rogue digital music stores – shutdown of AllofMP3 and US-Ukraine agreement to combat MP3Fiesta (IP Osgoode) The other anti-piracy strategy (PlagiarismToday) Copyright 2.0 show – episode 190 – US looks again to pass domain seizure legislation, NZ… [read post]
The Honourable Supreme Court of India, which adjudicated the landmark judgement on S. 3(d) in Novartis AG vs Union of India (Novartis SC judgement) in April 2013 concerning the chronic myeloid leukemia drug, Glivec® (active ingredient imatinib as a mesylate salt) clarified that S. 3(d) does not bar patent protection for all incremental inventions related to chemical and pharmaceutical substances, even though it rejected Novartis’s patent application on the beta-crystalline form of… [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
Software Pty Ltd v Bing Technologies Pty Limited (No 1) (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) Australian Bureau of Statistics going CC, under attribution-only licence (Creative Commons) (Michael Geist)   Canada Depreciation a possible ground in opposition proceedings: Parmalat Canada Inc v Sysco Corporation (Canadian Trademark Blog) Trademarks Office considers changes to opposition practice (International Law Office) Parody defence not available according to BC Supreme Court: Canwest v… [read post]
30 May 2008, 9:09 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am by admin
This equipment, known as exhaust after-treatment devices (ATDs), controls engine exhaust emissions once the emissions have exited the engine and entered the exhaust system. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 10:45 pm by Ben Vernia
Ltd. and its Japanese and United States affiliates (collectively Toyo) demonstrates the breadth of cases the dep [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:00 pm
Liability for Tranche operators would be based on a theory of inducement to infringe, as articulated by the Supreme Court in its landmark P2P decision.23 Tranche has several features that undercut such an inducement theory. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
  Amnesty International described the judgment as “a landmark decision for press freedom in the UK”. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 12:18 am
Global Broadcast News Ltd & Ors (Spicy IP) Foraying into non-traditional identity: non-traditional trade mark registrations (International Law Office) India's first 'doctrine of equivalents' case: Ravi Kamal Bali v Kala Tech (Spicy IP) Response to the Mint article on alleged corruption in the Indian Patent Offices (Patent Circle) Transparency in the court: recording oral proceedings - the way forward? [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am by INFORRM
During the hearing, Chew confirmed that Chinese engineers have access to US data. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:12 pm by INFORRM
The bloc’s competition regulator found major violations in how it operated its Android mobile OS to consolidate the dominant position of its search engine. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 2:06 am by Ray Dowd
I have reproduced almost the entirety of Wikipedia's entry on the fair use doctrine in italics below, you can find the original here. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
Marxist historians Jock McCulloch and Geoffrey Tweedale, and others, have attacked Bartrip for serving as an apologist for industry, and have suggested, in their publications, that Selikoff testified infrequently:= “[Selikoff] gave testimony in two of the early landmark legal cases, but thereafter avoided the drama of the courtroom and the role of the expert witness, not only because it would have been a drain on his time and made his confidentia [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 3:30 pm by Barry Sookman
The case raises issues of such significance to copyright holders and online service providers that it may well end up as a landmark precedent of the U.S. [read post]