Search for: "Lay v. Butler*"
Results 41 - 60
of 65
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Dec 2009, 8:46 pm
In Towson v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 3:45 am
In Smith v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
The right mounted court challenges with mixed results for decades, until this June when the Supreme Court’s conservative supermajority ruled in Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 12:00 pm
The guidance also states that consideration of the financial resources of applicants that are State or Federal government entities will be handled differently and lays out those considerations. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 11:00 am
All of the opinions in NFIB v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 1:29 pm
The relevant language grants Congress the power to “lay and collect Taxes . . . to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 1:01 am
Epperson v. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 3:46 am
Four years later, however, the Lords revisited the principles established by Fairchild in the case of Barker v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 1:06 pm
Deck v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:19 am
Ogden Chief Justice Marshall had written that the Clause empowered Congress to lay down the rule by which commerce (not persons in commerce) could be regulated. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am
Surely, ordinary lay juries often do not have the time to devote to such a case to do justice to the issues. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 7:02 pm
Butler v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 3:38 pm
Pix credit here For those of you who have been following my step by step encounter with Jan Broekman's path-breaking book, Knowledge in Change: The Semiotics of Cognition and Conversation (Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature, 2023), I am happy to announce that the entire work is now ready for review as a discussion draft.The abstract described my intentions: Humans create but do not regulate generative systems of data based programs (so-called… [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:38 am
” This statement sounds very much like the interpretive principle underlying one of John Marshall’s most famous remarks in McCulloch v. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 5:10 am
This lack of a consistent common law on the issue leaves the bar and trial court judges with great uncertainty on the issue.The Initial PreferenceIt has been about five years since the automobile accident litigation landscape was changed by a 2005 state Supreme Court case, Insurance Federation of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 7:30 am
Their images should be treated with the same scorn as those depicting Chief Justice Roger Taney, the author of the execrable decision in Dred Scott v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 8:12 am
Finally, I'll also explain why the article's new account of the original understanding of the Necessary and Proper Clause can serve as a useful framework for addressing some of the issues presented in Bond v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:59 pm
Choice, v.50, no. 06, February 2013. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 4:00 pm
Evan Brown posted a snippet of the Daily Show's wonderful explanation of the Viacom v. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 9:28 pm
The Constitution, by the way, does not actually use the word “spending” in laying out the legislative powers it gives to Congress. [read post]
