Search for: "Lemley v. Lemley"
Results 41 - 60
of 614
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2016, 2:42 pm
Back in 2011, IPBiz had commented on Lemley's response to Katznelson in the post Mark Lemley strikes back, related to issues expressed in Lemley's "Myth of the Sole Inventor. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 8:20 am
Malibu Boats and Microsoft v. [read post]
4 Sep 2021, 8:09 pm
Mark Lemley of Stanford Law School, Caroline Wong of Sidley... [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 10:01 am
(Which is not to say that Lemley's solution is right as a policy matter—as I said before, I would want to see some discussion of how it would apply in actual cases, which is currently lacking from Lemley's draft.)Stay tuned: as amicus briefs for CLS Bank come in and as scholars debate these ideas at Santa Clara's conference in November, I'm sure there will be much more commentary on software patents in the coming months! [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 5:14 pm
Co. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 6:18 am
Supreme Court decision given in Jun 2014 in the case of Alice v CLS, which arguably makes it more difficult to obtain business method patents. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 10:41 am
Herbert Wamsley: Commerce’s Shared Services Scheme Will Put US Patent System At Risk Joseph Herndon: Lismont v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 5:18 pm
Lemley & Christopher R. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 4:34 am
[One wonders where Mark Lemley was?] [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 9:51 pm
An excellent article in the New Yorker about trade secrets, talent mobility, and Google v. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 1:39 pm
Karkhanis (slides showing application of 112(f) as Lemley suggests to 10 PAE patents and 20 control patents)A Simple Approach to Setting Reasonable Royalties for Standard-Essential Patents, by Mark A. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 8:54 am
Filed today: Mark McKenna, Chris Sprigman, Mark Lemley, Tyler Ochoa, Betsy Rosenblatt, Pam Samuelson, Kathy Strandburg, and I submitted a brief in this copyright separability case, arguing that conceptual separability is simply a coda to physical separability, dealing with situations in which physical separation couldn't be accomplished without destroying the useful article--regardless, there must be something other than the design of the article itself that can be identified as a… [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 12:21 am
Lemley & Kimberly A. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 6:39 am
Lemley & Sean B. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 3:28 pm
Unlike Lemley, I am convinced that the algorithm requirement makes no sense. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 2:29 pm
Unlike Lemley, I am convinced that the algorithm requirement makes no sense. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 11:56 pm
[See More on Edison and the light bulb and ethical norms in intellectual property scholarship ] Within "Myth," Lemley also discusses the corset as an example of multiple independent invention, wherein he statesThe corset, itself the subject of one of the best-known Supreme Court patent cases, Egbert v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 8:07 pm
In LKQ Corporation v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 12:50 pm
Lemley Stanford Law School Arti K. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 5:58 pm
Lemley (Stanford) & Myhrvold (IntVen) have released a short article on “how to make a patent market. [read post]
