Search for: "List of ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED January 20, 2015." Results 41 - 60 of 65
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2017, 6:07 pm by Lisa Milam-Perez
The rule also revised OLMS Forms LM-10 and LM-20, documents that must be filed when an employer engages a labor relations consultant to undertake efforts to persuade employees regarding whether to vote for union representation. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
STANDARD OF REVIEW Summary judgments are reviewed de novo. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 3:33 am by Peter Mahler
One has to wonder why the majority shareholder apparently chose not to exercise his statutory buyout rights within 90 days of Digeser’s filing the petition under BCL § 1118. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am by Abbott & Kindermann
        2015 CEQA UPDATE  To read the 2015 cumulative CEQA review, click here:  B. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 7:35 am by Joy Waltemath
Could an appeal be heard and decided before January 20, when President Trump takes office? [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 5:57 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
TRACY, CA – JANUARY 20: Boxes move along a conveyor belt at an Amazon fulfillment center on January 20, 2015, in Tracy, California. [read post]
The bottom line is that unless a petition is on the summer list or comes up for consideration in December or January (when a relist might push argument to the next term), it ordinarily won’t be granted without at least one relist. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 5:29 pm
  A method for petitioning that focuses on administrative obligation was suggested--and it was an excellent part of the report--but the solutions were oriented toward mechanics that might have been more helpful had they been better contextualized (e.g., on my review of the new foreign NGO law). [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 12:18 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
         2015 CEQA UPDATE  To read the 2015 cumulative CEQA review, click here:  2. [read post]
14 May 2016, 3:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
In her third year, on November 20, 2012, petitioner participated in an annual review meeting concerning a special education student in her fourth-grade class (the Annual Review). [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
 Events Please let us know if there are any events you would like to be included on this list by email: inforrmeditorial@gmail.com. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 2:40 pm by familoo
Wall also flagged that there appeared to be a concerning suggestion in some of the case files reviewed by him in the preparation of his report, that it may be safe to order contact where domestic violence has been perpetrated on the mother but not the child. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 8:00 am by Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento
Supreme Court to overturn a federal appeals court’s rulings on transformative use, according to a petition for review filed Dec. 31. [read post]
Eighteen states, while arguing that the district courts had jurisdiction to hear their claims, filed protective petitions for review in their respective circuit courts. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
(For a further discussion of these state court securities suit, refer here and here.) [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm
James case (No. 6 below), the California Supreme Court ordered republished the decision of the Fourth Appellate District [167 Cal.App.4th 800, 84 Cal.Rptr.3d 464 (2008)], awarding the property to the plaintiff Diocese of San Diego; the defendants did not seek further review)6-8. [read post]