Search for: "Little v. THOMPSON COMPANY" Results 41 - 60 of 144
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2016, 11:54 pm by INFORRM
On 15 December 2016 there will be an application in the case of Hourani v Thompson. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 7:43 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
What made this case a little more complicated was the fact the company actively promoted recycling at its facility by its employees. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 2:57 am
BSI Enterprises Ltd & Another v Blue Mountain Music Ltd [2015] EWCA Civ 1151, a Court of Appeal, England and Wales, ruling of 18 November 2015, is one of those decisions that looks as though it ought to be quite exciting because of its celebrity content but which actually has little or nothing to entertain the reader. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 2:35 am
A famous example of a unique expression for a company is Macca's (McDonald's), which the fast-food company even appropriated as its own name due to its wide-spread use with the general populous. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 8:36 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Thompson, the Georgia Supreme Court unanimously held, in reliance on its 2009 ruling in Trinity Outdoor LLC v. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
Statements in Open Court and Apologies On Monday 23 February 2015 there was a statement in open court in Pritchard v Thompson before Warby J. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 3:30 am by Peter Mahler
” New York is one of the few states that imposes a minimum percentage, for which there’s little or no legislative history or support in the model acts. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 3:40 am by Peter Mahler
He may or may not anticipate an ultimate profit from the sale of his interest, but he normally draws very little from the corporation as dividends. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 4:55 am
This one is Chanel Inc. v Chanel’s Salon and Chanel Jones, 2:14-cv-00304, and sees fashion and cosmetics company Chanel as plaintiff. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 5:21 am
Earlier this month, the Third Circuit issued a precedential opinion in Thompson v. [read post]