Search for: "Local Trademarks v. Powers"
Results 41 - 60
of 260
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Dec 2015, 8:05 am
Appellees apparently relied on this advice and hand-delivered the appropriate documents to the local BLM office on that date. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:01 pm
(See, for example, Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 6:42 am
” Dickerson v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 7:02 am
Stanley v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 8:37 am
Trademark RegistrationBoth traditional trademarks (e.g., logos and brand names), and nontraditional trademarks (e.g., furniture designs), can be registered with at the USPTO. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 3:25 pm
& Appliance Service, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 6:15 am
The board found the trademarks would dilute RIM’s BlackBerry mark. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 3:41 am
In McZeal, Jr. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 5:02 am
Puerto Rico Coffee Roasters LLC v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 9:29 am
" Haynes v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 1:20 pm
Morales-Vázquez v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 3:27 am
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (Tee-Tee-Ā-Bee) has scheduled seven (7) oral hearings for the month of October 2019. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 5:30 am
The recently concluded (and now appealed) Gardner v. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 3:21 pm
It’s related to the question of whether market power promotes innovation. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 5:02 am
" Haynes v. [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 6:43 pm
In NFL v. [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 6:43 pm
In NFL v. [read post]
9 Apr 2022, 12:22 am
The most important question surrounding the Ericsson v. [read post]
10 Jul 2021, 5:01 am
This also includes the Munich court's new "local dish": anti-antisuit injunctions. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 11:58 am
Tam, the government argued unsuccessfully that it could ban "offensive" trademarks because issuing a trademark is government speech. [read post]
