Search for: "Long v State" Results 41 - 60 of 50,872
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2024, 8:40 am by David Pozen
The judiciary likewise could have ruled out long mandatory prison terms for nonviolent, nontrafficking offenses under the federal or state constitutional prohibitions on cruel and unusual punishment. [read post]
20 May 2024, 7:24 am by Tom Dannenbaum
Warrants would also provide the focal point for political and legal mobilization in third states, including the United States, making it harder to sustain military aid to Israel. [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:01 am by Doriane Coleman
This was already the question in 1996 when [Ruth Bader] Ginsburg penned the majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
19 May 2024, 9:05 pm by The Regulatory Review
Aug 29, 2023 | Could West Virginia v EPA Strengthen State Climate Laws | Scholars argue that a recent Supreme Court decision may bolster state climate lawsuits. [read post]
19 May 2024, 4:01 am by Administrator
Criminal Law: Language RightsR. v. [read post]
18 May 2024, 7:41 am by Russell Knight
Ingram, 2015 IL App (1st) 142439 (10 ½ month delay); Long v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 9:05 pm by Tyler Hoguet
Schweber and Anderson explain that under the test established in Brandenburg v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 12:29 pm by Josh Blackman
I am doubtful that Justice Barrett would have joined United States v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 8:36 am by Eric Goldman
by guest blogger Guy Rub, The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law A Web Scraper Beats a Platform: The Same Story, but Different It seems like we’ve been here before, and not that long ago. [read post]
16 May 2024, 10:30 pm by Michael Chatzipanagiotis
Ever since, the MC99 provisions have been an integral part of the EU legal order (C-344/04 IATA and ELFAA, para. 36), save for the provisions on cargo, for which competence rests with the EU Member States. [read post]
16 May 2024, 12:11 pm by centerforartlaw
Broderick on August 28.[42] Most recently, in an order filed by United States Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on February 12, 2024, the Court addressed a pending privilege dispute over which state’s law should apply to resolve the documents.[43] Another issue was whether the attorney-client privilege between the Estate and its counsel exten [read post]