Search for: "Longe v. Department of Employment SEC."
Results 41 - 60
of 183
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2016, 3:30 am
Department of Labor here. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 12:58 pm
Secs. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 11:38 am
The Senate draft legislation would establish an Agency for Financial Stability composed of the SEC, Fed and CFTC, with an independent Chair appointed by the President. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 6:08 pm
Yet for a long time this “puzzle” has been largely reserved to academic debates.[2] Indeed, case law addressing challenges to agency adjudication on Article III or Seventh Amendment grounds has been sparse.[3] Until recently. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
District Court for the District of Columbia Circuit issued a long opinion rejecting arguments made by major business trade groups that the new NLRB union election rules exceed the NLRB’s statutory authority, are arbitrary and capricious and violate employers’ rights under the First and Fifth Amendments to the Constitution. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 11:29 am
Code sec. 12940, et seq.). [read post]
7 May 2018, 4:00 am
Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 2:00 am
” See Sec’y of Labor v. [read post]
18 Dec 2024, 10:37 am
Supreme Court‘s dismissal of a writ of certiorari in late November in Facebook Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 9:10 am
Justice Kane referred back to a prior 3rd Department decision, Valentine v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 10:43 am
In fact, several courts had applied this exemption (29 U.S.C. sec. 213(b)(10)(A)) to service advisors. [read post]
11 May 2015, 11:54 am
For how long? [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm
L.R. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 11:09 am
Sec. 440.13(3)(d). [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
The first clause—what John Vlahoplus helpfully refers to as the “Positions Clause”—identifies the government offices and other employments that a covered rebel or insurrectionist is prohibited from “hold[ing]. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
One of Justice Scalia's most famous majority opinions was Employment Division v. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 4:40 pm
Lastly, Siobhan Hughes reports here (subscription req'd) in the Wall Street Journal that the Justice Department refrained from filing an amicus brief in Stoneridge Investment Partners v. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 4:44 pm
Department of Justice’s accomplice liability theories. [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 4:15 am
Section 206 is directed at providing a minimum standard of living while § 207 is concerned with deterring long hours by making those hours more expensive for the employer. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, ET AL. [read post]
