Search for: "Lopez et al v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 74
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2011, 5:23 pm
For example, in the case of In re: Lopez, No. 09-10346, 2011 WL 576820 (Bankr. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 7:57 am
Lopez in 1995 and United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 3:02 pm
’ [Lopez v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 11:53 am
However, as Judicial Watch noted, in United States v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 4:43 pm
(forthcoming) Title: Lopez v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
[et al.]. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
(United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 1:59 pm
United States, the U.S. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 6:44 am
California Pharmacists AssociationDocket: 09-1158Issue(s): (1) Whether Medicaid recipients and providers may maintain a cause of action under the Supremacy Clause to enforce § 1396a(a)(30)(A) by asserting that the provision preempts a state law reducing reimbursement rates; and (2) whether a state law reducing Medicaid reimbursement to providers may be held preempted by § 1396a(a)(30)(A) based on requirements that do not appear in the text of the statute.Certiorari-Stage… [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 7:47 pm
Andre In Overhill Farms, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 1:10 pm
Lopez (1995), United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 11:02 am
United StatesDocket: 10-18Issue(s): Whether, when a trial judge’s restriction on the cross-examination of a prosecution witness is challenged on appeal as a violation of the Confrontation Clause, the proper standard of review is de novo or abuse of discretion.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionAmicus brief of the United States Army Defense Appellate DivisionAmicus brief of the… [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 6:11 am
Dix et al., McCormick on Evidence § 234 (6th ed. 2009)). [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 8:25 pm
Lopez (1995), United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 7:53 am
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London, et al., 4-09-CV-03712 (S.D. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 9:15 am
United StatesDocket: 09-1554Issue(s): 1) Whether the Supreme Court's decision in Yeager v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 7:49 pm
Federalism by Jury in United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 2:59 am
[8]Foodborne illness outbreaks are obviously not associated with weddings only in the United States. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am
GraceTERRY MABRY et al. [read post]
27 May 2010, 7:55 pm
See generally United States v. [read post]
