Search for: "Lord v. USA"
Results 41 - 60
of 187
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2018, 9:34 am
” It will come as no surprise to many IPKat readers that a U.S. court has found that the SCC order is not enforceable in the USA. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 2:27 am
As the Sixth Interim Report of the Law Revision Committee said in 1937 in relation to the Statute of Frauds:" 'The Act', in the words of Lord Campbell . . . 'promotes more frauds than it prevents'. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 2:27 am
As the Sixth Interim Report of the Law Revision Committee said in 1937 in relation to the Statute of Frauds:" 'The Act', in the words of Lord Campbell . . . 'promotes more frauds than it prevents'. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm
This overrides the orthodox position at common law (as re-affirmed by the House of Lords in Berezovsky v Michaels [2000] 1 WLR 1004), to the effect that each actionable publication of a defamatory statement constitutes a separate tort which must be considered separately when deciding if the English court has jurisdiction to hear a claim about it. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 2:10 pm
However, in the bedroom tax decision in R(MA and others) v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 8:01 am
Brief for Appellant, Reed v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 9:06 am
Lord Kerr, dissenting on that aspect, pointed to decisions such as Zenati v MPC [2015] QB 758 (in which a dilatory decision to discontinue a false passport prosecution engaged Article 5 rights) and Norris v USA #2 [2010] 2 AC 487 (obiter dicta concerning the applicability of art 8 regarding detention for the purpose of prosecution). [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 6:43 am
George Harrison - My Sweet Lord (1970)Your browser does not support the audio element. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 4:02 pm
In a rare radio interview this week the President of the Supreme Court, Lord Neuberger, said that politicians were too slow to defend judges after November’s Brexit case. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 4:06 pm
Newspapers Journalism and Regulation A new amendment in the House of Lords has kept the pressure on the government to enact Section 40 of the Crime and Courts Act. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 4:04 pm
USA It has been suggested that President Trump’s doctor may have violated privacy laws by giving an interview in which he said that the President takes “male baldness” pills. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 4:08 pm
As already mentioned, on 24, 25 and 26 January 2017, the Supreme Court (Lords Neuberger, Mance, Sumption, Hughes and Hodge) heard the joined appeals in the cases of Flood v Times Newspapers, Miller v Associated Newspapers and Frost v MGN. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:25 am
On 20 January 2017, Sir Davie Eady heard applications in the case of Daryanani -v- Ramnani. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 4:08 pm
Surveillance and Information Gathering The House of Lords voted strongly in favour of an amendment to the Investigatory Powers Bill to give specific recognition to privacy as “a fundamental priority”. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 5:03 pm
Second, although Britain did indeed intervene in Europe in 1939, in the shape of declaring war on Germany, it is extremely doubtful that it could have emerged on the winning side in 1945 without two other interventions: those of the Soviet Union and the USA, both in 1941. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 8:44 am
Background This case concerns the House of Lords’ judgment in R (Bancoult No 2) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2008] UKHL 61 and its interaction with the plight of the former inhabitants of the Chagos Islands, a tiny archipelago of coral atolls in the Indian Ocean. [read post]
26 May 2016, 6:00 am
United Kingdom In the United Kingdom, the Assisted Dying Bill was introduced in front of the House of Lords on 15 May, 2013. [read post]
22 May 2016, 4:05 pm
Barrister Keir Monteith, for Norman, told the three-judge panel, led by Lord Chief Justice Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd, that the appeal hinged on the decision of Mirror Group Newspapers to “give up” details of the prison officer. [read post]
News: Supreme Court will give judgment in privacy injunction case of PJS v News Group on 19 May 2016
16 May 2016, 5:25 am
On 6 April 2016 a magazine in the USA published an account of PJS’s sexual activities, naming those involved. [read post]
8 May 2016, 4:15 pm
Lord Lester QC wrote a curious article in the Daily Telegraph criticising the celebrity injunction as being part of ‘an attack on the freedom of the press. [read post]
