Search for: "MARK A. CAMPBELL"
Results 41 - 60
of 860
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2023, 6:28 pm
" (Hugh Hall Campbell, KC v. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 9:32 am
Jane LambertPatents Court (Douglas Campbell KC) Newron Pharmaceuticals SpA v Comptroller-General of Patents, Trade Marks and Designs [2023] EWHC 1471 (Ch) (16 June 2023)This was an appeal by Newron Pharmaceutical SpA ("Newron") against the decision of Dr L Cullen in Re SPC/GB15/046, Newron Pharmaceuticals S.p.A v Comptroller BLO/1053/22 1 Dec 2022. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
The lawsuit by Stephen Richer, the Maricopa County recorder, marks the most aggressive attempt to hold Lake and her allies accountable for election-related misinformation. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:07 am
The majority opinion in Warhol purports to follow the Campbell framework, but instead it reinterprets Campbell in ways that destabilize that three-decade consensus, likely resulting in a decade or more of renewed battle over the contours of the fair-use doctrine. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 4:33 pm
Think of Andy Warhol’s paintings of Campbell’s soup cans: No one would ever think the inclusion of Campbell’s trademarks was meant to tell you who made the paintings. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 10:46 am
For example, in 1994, the Court held in Campbell v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 10:00 am
Justice Sotomayor highlighted the 1994 Supreme Court opinion in Campbell v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 1:38 am
Alas, Campbell’s discontinued Pepper Pot in 2010. [read post]
20 May 2023, 3:27 am
@Elena: Did you actually read Campbell and Google? [read post]
12 May 2023, 4:00 am
Senate Panel Asks Crow for Full Accounting of Gifts to Thomas, Other Justices MSN – Liz Goodwin and Marianne LeVine (Washington Post) | Published: 5/8/2023 The Senate Judiciary Committee asked billionaire Harlan Crow to provide a full accounting of the free travel and other gifts he has made to Supreme Court Judge Clarence Thomas or any other justice, marking an escalation of the committee’s efforts to convince the court to adopt stricter ethical standards for itself. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 4:00 am
National/Federal Chief Justice Declines to Testify Before Congress Over Ethics Concerns DNyuz – Abbie VanSickle (New York Times) | Published: 4/25/2023 Chief Justice John Roberts told the Senate Judiciary Committee he was declining its invitation to testify about ethics rules for the Supreme Court. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
Katie Hobbs is seeking a review of what her office alleges was “likely unethical conduct” by the state’s former attorney general, Mark Brnovich. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 7:01 am
Neither trade mark covered digital assets.The French fashion house sued Hermés for trade mark infringement, essentially referring to a risk of confusion for consumers, as well as trade mark dilution and cybersquatting.Defendant Rothschild mainly centred his counterarguments on the Roger test (as established in 1989 case Rogers v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am
This post is co-authored by Campbell University law professor Gregory Wallace, who has published two articles on "assault weapons," the most recent being "Assault Weapon" Lethality, 88 Tenn. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm
“Mark, you should call Jeff. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 12:49 pm
In Rothschild’s view, the MetaBirkins were akin to Andy Warhol’s famous Campbell’s Soup Cans6 as a comment on consumerism. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 7:54 am
By Guest Blogger Tyler Ochoa [Eric’s note: Prof. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 12:16 pm
Lunney: points out that Campbell was just a remand. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 6:56 am
Super Lawyers selected these attorneys: Betsy Weber, Bankruptcy, Banking, Business Litigation Kent Wicker, White Collar Crimes, General Litigation, Health Care David Kramer, Personal Injury, Medical Malpractice: Defense Katie Cassidy Tranter, Employment & Labor Bob Hoffer, Employment & Labor David Dirr, Health Care Dressman, James, Banking Andrew Pellino, Health Care Mark Guilfoyle, Administrative Law Super Lawyers also selected these… [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
As Professor Jud Campbell has written, almost everyone at the Founding (and before) thought “rights were not a set of determinate legal privileges or immunities that the government could not abridge. [read post]
