Search for: "MATTER OF B G B"
Results 41 - 60
of 4,174
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jan 2014, 9:00 am
Bidding; B. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 8:56 am
Matter of J-G-P- does not purport to reassess longstanding BIA and Ninth Circuit precedent concerning simple assault offenses, and because it misapplied that precedent, its conclusion is unreasonable. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 6:01 pm
The objection is raised against claim 14, which the [opponent] argued to be directed to an essentially biological process for the production of animals.[3] This objection has not been mentioned in the statement setting out the grounds of appeal, but the Board notes that the opposition was originally filed inter alia on the ground that the subject-matter of the patent was not patentable under A 53(b) […].[4] The [opponent] has explained that it decided to raise the objection… [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm
”, the appellant’s objection as regards the subject-matter of claim 13 could be relevant under the requirements of A 100(b). [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 8:17 am
B. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 5:00 am
Aug. 11, 2011), the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) brought charges against Toby G. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 1:00 am
In the grounds of appeal of 28 March 2019, the applicant referred to T 1063/18 which decided that Rule 28(2) is in conflict with Art.53(b) as interpreted by the Enlarged Board in G 2/12 and G 2/13 and that the refusal in that case based on Rule 28(2) should be set aside. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 11:07 pm
Visual answer below the jump: So far, no federal trademark applications appear to be on file, so how serious can they b with g? [read post]
13 May 2014, 7:55 pm
See Exxon Research & Eng’g v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 8:11 am
Paul Wickham Schmidt, former Chair of the BIA , filed this dissent to Matter of J-G-R- , 23 I &N Dec. 733 (BIA 2023). [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 7:13 am
While exceptions to Rule 12(g)(2)’s timing requirement exist for challenges related to failure to state a claim or lack of subject matter jurisdiction, there are no exceptions to Rule 12(g)(2) for venue. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 12:53 pm
By: Jonathan G. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 7:51 pm
We conclude as a matter of lawthat it was not. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 6:28 am
g. [read post]
10 May 2014, 9:05 am
While in a B&B on a short overnight family-related roadtrip, I started reading a copy of Evelyn Waugh's Brideshead Revisited that they had in the room, (I'm a big Waugh fan, but tend to prefer the snark, or for that matter the harrowing Ordeal of Gilbert Penfold, to the mellow mists of memory.) [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:25 pm
B&G Foods, Inc., No. 21-cv-5104 (N.D. [read post]
24 May 2024, 5:35 pm
See Matter of C-G-T-, 28 I&N Dec. 740, 745 (BIA 2023) (explaining that “when considering future harm, adjudicators should not expect a respondent to hide” the respondent’s sexual orientation). [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 9:53 am
In Matter of R.B v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 3:26 am
Domestic Relations Law § 240 (1-b), subdivisions (d) (g) and (i) were amended accordingly. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 9:34 am
In B & G Aventura, LLC vs. [read post]
