Search for: "MATTER OF C R O" Results 41 - 60 of 1,790
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2008, 10:12 pm
(Hey, I warned you upfront that it was B-O-R-I-N-G.) [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 4:30 am by Mary Giorgi
In a recent Multidistrict Litigation products liability matter pending in South Carolina, Chief Judge David C. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 4:31 am
He then sent the matter to the Secretary of State (for her consideration of the statutory criteria). [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 2:34 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
This Week In the Supreme Court – w/c 13th December 2021  Hearings in the Supreme Court are now shown live on the Court’s website. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 7:12 am
Takeaway:  A PTAB panel introduced a new ground of rejection sua sponte finding that the claimed subject matter was directed to patent-ineligible subject matter. [read post]
§ 1447(c) requires a case be remanded “[i]f at any time before final judgment it appears that the district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 5:31 pm by Kevin LaCroix
To review, a Side A DIC policy typically sits excess of a traditional Side ABC D&O policy, providing an additional layer of protection and limits for individual directors and officers, which cannot be consumed by claims against the insured entity via Side B (indemnifiable claims) and Side C (direct claims against the entity). [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 5:13 pm by Kevin LaCroix
No Side A Coverage D&O policies provide three types of coverage, called Side A, Side B and Side C. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 4:30 am
’" *** For example, the police officer is ineligible for GML §207-c benefits if he or she "ceased to be an inhabitant within the geographical restrictions" set by law as the court explained in O'Connor v Town of Clarkstown, 221 AD2d 444. [read post]
16 Dec 2018, 2:14 pm by Kevin LaCroix
When the investigation and lawsuits arose following the restatements, AR Capital and VEREIT submitted the matters to the D&O insurers as claims under the program. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 9:00 pm by Laurent Teyssèdre
La présente demande (EP2) avait été rejetée pour cause de double brevetabilité car revendiquant, pour la division d'examen, le même objet que le brevet parent EP1.Tandis que EP1 revendique une seconde utilisation thérapeutique sous la forme d'une revendication de type suisse, EP2 revendique la même utilisation, mais sous la forme désormais admise d'une composition (Art 54(5) CBE).La Chambre examine ce que disent les… [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 4:21 am by Kevin LaCroix
As those involved in D&O Insurance claims well know, a recurring D&O insurance problem is the question of whether or not the D&O insurer for a bankrupt company can pay the costs of the bankrupt company’s former directors and officers incurred in defending claims against them. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 4:45 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In an August 27, 2015 post-trial opinion (discussed here), Delaware Vice-Chancellor Travis Laster found that Dole Foods CEO David Murdock, and its General Counsel and Chief Operating Officer, C. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 4:57 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  MusclePharm submitted all of these various matters to its D&O insurance carrier and sought to have its defense expenses and other costs incurred in responding to be paid for by the insurer. [read post]