Search for: "MATTER OF D V"
Results 41 - 60
of 22,862
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2013, 11:45 am
Salazar (D. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 11:45 am
Salazar (D. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 2:14 am
AL (Albania) v Secretary for State the Home Department; FN (Gambia) v Same; DN(Bangladesh) v Same: [2012] EWCA Civ 710; [2012] WLR (D) 16 “In statutory appeals to the Court of Appeal from the Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber), if the appeal had been allowed by consent, with the appellant obtaining the remittal sought, or if the appeal had been resolved by the grant of a status which was not previously offered, then provided… [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 9:33 am
Ewing v Director of Public Prosecutions; [2008] WLR (D) 276; [2008] WLR (D) 276 “It was necessary for a person who was the subject of a civil proceedings order to seek leave, under s 42(3) of the Supreme Court Act 1981, to make an application for permission to proceed with a claim for judicial review notwithstanding that the underlying decision he sought to challenge related to a criminal cause or matter. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 2:41 am
R (A) v Director of Establishments of the Security Service [2009] EWCA Civ 24; [2009] WLR (D) 63 “The Administrative Court did not have jurisdiction to entertain a claim that a public authority proposed to act in a way incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights where the matters brought up were within the purview [...] [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 2:49 am
R (Tait) v Criminal Injuries Compensation Appeals Panel [2009] EWHC 767 (Admin); [2009] WLR (D) 138 “As a matter of construction of para 11 of the Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme 2001, a finding that it was not the motive of a driver in using his vehicle to inflict or attempt to inflict injury on any person [...] [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 1:27 am
Hall & Woodhouse Ltd v Poole Borough Council; [2009] WLR (D) 131 “The acts of third parties were not as a matter of law to be imputed to a premises licence holder for the purposes of s 136(1)(a) of the Licensing Act 2003; it was necessary for the court to look at the actual conduct of [...] [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 7:32 am
In the case of Matter of Emanuel S. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 9:59 pm
District Court Adopts Magistrate's Conclusion of Invalidity under § 101 and Grants Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Counts By Donald Zuhn -- Last month, in Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 9:59 pm
By Donald Zuhn -- In April, in Xlear, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 9:59 pm
By Donald Zuhn -- Last week, in Ni-Q, LLC v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 1:15 pm
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 10-0194, 2010 MT 288, STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 2:55 pm
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 10-0214, 2011 MT 10, STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 3:04 pm
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 10-0179, 2010 MT 268, STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 6:28 am
RICHARD CONVERSE d/b/a DC TAX SERVICE, INC., Respondents and Appellants. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 2:52 am
Regina v Knaggs [2009] EWCA Crim 1363; [2009] WLR (D) 239 “A defendant who had pleaded guilty to an offence without any challenge to the facts by way of a Newton hearing was not thereby debarred, as a matter of law, from challenging the prosecution evidence for the purposes of a confiscation hearing. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 7:36 am
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 09-0035, 2009 MT 418, TIM GIACOMELLI, DON HAMILTON, YELLOWSTONE HORSE RACING ALLIANCE, INC., and YELLOWSTONE COUNTY, METRAPARK, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 2:42 am
D - LINK SYSTEMS , INC . [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 3:13 pm
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 07-0376, 2009 MT 209, JANELLE McDONALD, Charging Party, Respondent and Appellant, v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 10:28 am
Matter of Bennett v. [read post]
