Search for: "MATTER OF R L T" Results 41 - 60 of 3,882
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2014, 11:00 am by EEM
Addressing Sexual Violence in and Beyond the Warzone, Rapid Response Briefing, no. 7 (IDS, June 2014) [text]A Call to Action on Gender and Humanitarian Reform (CARE International, Sept. 2014) [text via ReliefWeb]"Domestic Violence Asylum after Matter of L-R-," Yale Law Journal, vol. 123, no. 7 (May 2014) [full-text]Domestic Violence-Based Asylum Claims: CGRS Practice Advisory (Center for Gender & Refugee Studies, updated Sept. 2014) [text]Good Practices… [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 2:50 pm by Mary
DEADLINE to submit comments (informal, individuals, associations, formal, any) is MAY 2 DRAFT N J L A L E T T E R H E A D Federal Trade Commission Office of the Secretary, Room H-113 (Annex D) 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20580 Re: Google Buzz, File No.1023136 To the FTC: The New Jersey Library Association submits this comment on the proposed consent order, In the Matter of Google Inc., File No. 1023136, between the FTC and… [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 5:25 pm by INFORRM
On 18 June 2014 the Supreme Court handed down judgment in R (T) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] UKSC 35. [read post]
11 Dec 2016, 2:24 pm
En particulier, l’intérêt public peut dicter un tel devoir. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 2:11 pm
Caldwell (1894) 101 Cal. 553, we confronted situations in which law firms dissolved with contingency matters pending. [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 7:38 pm by Michael Froomkin
Quelle que soit la nature de la réponse de la société (ou devrais-je dire des sociétés ?) [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 9:00 pm by Laurent Teyssèdre
" Malheureusement, la Chambre n'a pas eu à trancher cette question, le brevet ayant été révoqué pour une autre raison. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The petition for review concerns the decision in appeal T 128/08 revoking the opposed patent. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
R v Royal, 2022 ABCA 330 (CanLII) [12] Accordingly, when the Crown took charge of the matter at that point, the matter should have been brought to a superior court judge, not to another provincial court judge. [read post]
19 May 2017, 7:10 am by Nico Cordes
After T 910/03 it languished but occasionally reappeared.The Board refrains from referring the matter to the EBoA as it considers such referral not to be decisive in the present case, since according to the Board a same conclusion would be reached using both the essentiality test and the gold standard (being that the removal violates Art. 76(1) EPC).Entscheidungsgründe(...)2. [read post]
25 May 2018, 1:00 pm by Mary Whisner
But we aren't the only ones.You can even find T-shirts to show your support, with captions like "Facts and Evidence: They're Gr-r-eat! [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 5:51 am
Raúl Grijalva (D-AZ), quoted in "Exasperated Democrats try to rein in Ocasio-Cortez/The effort is part carrot, part stick. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:01 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
NFAP surmised that the increased rate of denials has resulted in harming the competitiveness of US employers and has discouraged companies from bringing new business and jobs into the United States.[4] According to NFAP’s executive summary: [t]he evidence indicates adjudicators or others at U.S. [read post]