Search for: "MATTER OF RULES ON DISQUALIFICATION" Results 41 - 60 of 1,128
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2023, 6:11 pm by Ilya Somin
 The post Maine and Michigan Issue Rulings on Trump and Section 3 Disqualification appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 7:50 am by Mack Sperling
 The disqualification issue distilled to whether the two lawsuits were "substantially related" per Rule 1.9. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 6:52 am
  The attorneys of Eccleston Law LLC represent investors and advisers nationwide in securities and employment matters. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
Disqualification should follow where a lawyer acted in a matter directly adverse to the immediate interests of a current client. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 1:01 pm by Patrick G. Brady and James J. Sawczyn
Board of Review, the New Jersey Supreme Court, in a 4-3 majority opinion, recently clarified two issues surrounding the application of the above two exceptions to the disqualification rule for voluntarily leaving employment. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 2:42 pm by admin
In evaluating the disqualification motion filed by Micron, the Court posed the following questions to determine if the prior representations and the current one were “substantially related”: To determine whether a current matter is “substantially related” to a matter involved in a former representation, and, thus, whether disqualification under Rule 1.9 is appropriate, the Court must answer the following three questions: “(1)… [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 2:42 pm by admin
In evaluating the disqualification motion filed by Micron, the Court posed the following questions to determine if the prior representations and the current one were “substantially related”: To determine whether a current matter is “substantially related” to a matter involved in a former representation, and, thus, whether disqualification under Rule 1.9 is appropriate, the Court must answer the following three questions: “(1)… [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 6:34 am by Vanessa Schoenthaler
An issuer may need to seek waivers of disqualification, terminate the relationship with covered persons, provide Rule 506(e) disclosure, or take such other remedial steps to address the Rule 506(d) disqualification. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 8:11 am by Dan Bressler
” “‘Having reviewed this record, we agree with Judge Lynott that plaintiff failed to carry her burden to prove that disqualification of the Wilentz firm is justified,’ the appeals court said in an unsigned ruling. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:09 am
Long ago in Texas, the federal courts applied the Texas Rules in deciding disqualification motions; then, two disqualification motions were filed in Texas federal courts which resulted in two opinions from the Fifth Circuit holding that "federal law" -- not state disciplinary rules -- control disqualification motions in federal court. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 9:16 am by Seth Barrett Tillman
In fact, the Senate rule does not hint at what matters might be determined appropriate, and it does not expressly mention either “removal” or “disqualification. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 4:42 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Akin to a pro-se situation, when law firms defend themselves in a legal malpractice setting they run the risk of attorney disqualification on the attorney-witness rule. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 9:54 am by Giles Peaker
On iii) “I am satisfied that the matters to which Mr Hall had regard were those to which rule (d) entitled him to have regard and which were encompassed by the rule’s requirement that the decision-maker consider whether the relevant behaviour would have entitled the Defendant to a possession order. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:59 am by PaulKostro
Disqualification of counsel originally appeared on NJ Family Issues on July 23, 2012. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 6:32 am by Dan Bressler
” “The court concluded that, like the 2009 matter, neither of the more recent contacts resulted in Perkins Coie obtaining information that could be harmful to BeSang in the Intel case. [read post]
14 May 2009, 1:35 pm
Judge Jolly granted the Motion to Disqualify, stating that the prior representation presented the "substantial risks contemplated under Rule 1.9" of the North Carolina Rules of Professional Conduct, and that "it is the court's duty to resolve any and all such risks in favor of disqualification. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 6:44 am by Dan Bressler
” “There are occasionally circumstances that make judicial recusal impractical if it would result in delay and distant travel for the parties when there is only one county judge who would be ethically disqualified from ruling on urgent or emergency matters affecting those parties. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 11:15 am
Committee Issues Disqualification and Disclosure Advice to Pro Tempore Appellate JusticesOral advice issued to trial court judge invited to sit on assignment in an appellate matter.The Supreme Court Committee on Judicial Ethics Opinions (CJEO) this month issued oral advice to a trial court judge invited to sit on assignment in an appellate matter.In a summary of that advice posted on its website, the committee examined the differing disqualification and disclosure rules… [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 6:11 am by Dan Bressler
The distinction matters because, if the Dyers were truly representing themselves in propria persona, there would be a good argument that the advocate-witness rule would not apply. [read post]