Search for: "MATTER OF V K"
Results 41 - 60
of 3,642
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2024, 6:48 pm
Toth v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
District Judge Margo K. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 4:57 am
ISRAEL-HAMAS WAR — INTERNATIONAL RESPONSE The International Court of Justice (ICJ) on Thursday issued additional provisional measures in South Africa v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 6:39 am
See Agar v Hyde, CLR 572 [16]. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
We did it in the 1960s when we first offered guidance on disclosure related to risk factors.[12] We did so in the 1970s regarding disclosure related to environmental risks.[13] We did so in 1980 when the agency adopted Management’s Discussion and Analysis sections in Form 10-K.[14] We did it again in the 1990s when we required disclosure about executive stock compensation[15] and in 1997 regarding market risk.[16] Of course, there was lively debate about each of these disclosure… [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 3:16 pm
Attorney James K. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 5:00 am
In the case of Calpin v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 5:07 am
Missouri, the former Missouri v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 4:12 am
"] From B.B. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 1:46 am
(T 439/22) (Jan 2024)Don't shoot yourself in the foot: European file history in US patent claim interpretation (K-fee v Nespresso) (Jan 2024)Description amendmentsBoard of Appeal finds no legal basis for the requirement to amend the description in line with the claims (T1989/18) (Dec 2021)Can amending the description to summarize the prior art add matter to the patent application as filed? [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 4:32 am
The following lengthy quote from the opinion also highlights Delaware law’s rigorous contractarian a/k/a freedom-of- contract approach to all things LLC: This argument is also unavailing. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 2:48 am
Under no circumstances,’ underlines judge Kūris in his elaborated dissenting opinion in Mesić v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 3:28 am
Norah did not win or place in the top 3, but that's not what truly matters, is it? [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:03 pm
[2] Disclosure Pertaining to Matters Involving the Environment and Civil Rights, Release No. 33-5170 (July 19, 1971) [36 FR 13989 (July 29, 1971)] [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
” This is precisely what the Supreme Court called for in TSC Industries v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 4:04 pm
From Honeyfund.com inc v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:44 am
” “Magistrate Judge Barbara Moses of the Southern District of New York recently addressed this issue in Bonde v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:46 pm
See Circle K Convenience Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
In short, the court concluded in LePage v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 9:12 am
The fact that a trade mark might be – even primarily – understood as a promotional formula, does not mean that it cannot be perceived as an indication of origin (CJEU, Smart Technologies v OHIM, C-311/11 P, at para. 30). [read post]
