Search for: "MCLAREN MACOMB" Results 41 - 60 of 85
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2024, 8:48 am by Jon Hyman
This case notwithstanding, I stand by my strong criticism of McLaren Macomb. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 9:06 am by Daniel Jin
In McLaren Macomb, the NLRB found a severance agreement to be “unlawful” based on its inclusion of what the NLRB considered to be overly-broad confidentiality and non-disparagement provisions. [read post]
2 May 2023, 10:02 am by Bruce C. Judge
The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) recently issued a decision in McLaren Macomb,  372 NLRB No. 58 (2023). [read post]
4 May 2023, 11:12 am by Nikki Mayo
The McLaren Macomb case involved furloughed employees that were offered a severance agreement containing non-disparagement language that prohibited them from making negative statements about the employer. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 12:44 pm by Erin Shaughnessy
   The Board’s opinion addresses the use of severance agreements by McLaren Macomb, a Michigan hospital that was forced to permanently furlough 11 employees in response to COVID-19. [read post]
Following the National Labor Relations Board’s (“NLRB”) highly-controversial decision in McLaren Macomb declaring most confidentiality and non-disparagement clauses in separation agreements to be unlawful, General Counsel Abruzzo this week declared her intention to seek to invalidate nearly all post-employment non-compete agreements, in a memorandum stating her prosecutorial position that “the proffer, maintenance, and enforcement” of non-compete… [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 4:10 am by Daniel Schwartz
Last week, the NLRB issued a landmark decision in McLaren Macomb that is already shaking up how private employers (both unionized and non-unionized) should consider severance agreements. [read post]
Following the National Labor Relations Board’s (“NLRB”) highly-controversial decision in McLaren Macomb declaring most confidentiality and non-disparagement clauses in separation agreements to be unlawful, General Counsel Abruzzo this week declared her intention to seek to invalidate nearly all post-employment non-compete agreements, in a memorandum stating her prosecutorial position that “the proffer, maintenance, and enforcement” of non-compete… [read post]
Notably, yesterday’s memo argues its expansion to non-compete restrictions is specifically based, in part, on the NLRB’s McLaren Macomb decision. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 6:19 am
NLRB General Counsel, Jennifer Abruzzo, issued a memorandum addressing the NLRB's decision in McLaren Macomb (memo | press release | McLaren decision). [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 7:02 am by Tiana Guzman
In a recent holding by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) on the case of McLaren Macomb and Local 40 RN Staff Council, Office and Professional Employees, International Union (OPEIU), AFL-CI0, Case 07-CA-263041, there were significant implications for non-disparagement and confidentiality clauses that will severely limit the ability for employers to use these clauses pertaining to both union and non-union employees. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 12:41 pm
Both the officer and the other man, a Chesterfield resident, were taken to McLaren Macomb Hospital, where Wisniewski was pronounced dead at the scene. [read post]
  To buttress her ever-expanding view of Section 7, the GC cited the Board’s recent decision in McLaren Macomb, 372 NLRB No. 58, slip op. at 4, 7 (2023) which found non-disparagement and confidentiality provisions in severance agreements to violate the Act, finding “the ‘future rights of employees as well as the rights of the public may not be traded away’ in a manner which requires ‘forbearance from future . . . concerted activities. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 11:34 am by Maribeth Meluch
The National Labor Relations Board (the Board) has recently decided in McLaren Macomb and Local 40 RN Staff Council, that the mere proffer of a severance agreement without more, that contains provisions which on their face alone the Board could interpret to interfere with employees’ rights under Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act, is an unlawful labor practice. [read post]
The National Labor Relations Board (“Board”) issued a ruling on February 21, 2023, in McLaren Macomb, 372 NLRB No. 58 (2023), which in effect finds broad confidentiality and non-disparagement clauses in severance agreements violate Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act (“Act”). [read post]
The National Labor Relations Board (“Board”) issued a ruling on February 21, 2023, in McLaren Macomb, 372 NLRB No. 58 (2023), which in effect finds broad confidentiality and non-disparagement clauses in severance agreements violate Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act (“Act”). [read post]